"Human rights" is simply a stick for the West to beat countries that it doesn't like, while ignoring far worse acts by western countries and their pets.
The memo sent to Rex Tillerson lays it out in black and white.
Brian Hook claimed in that memo to Tillerson that “Reagan's first instinct was always to back allies against adversaries, even in controversial cases, including through his second term. South Africa would be an excellent example. The approach used there was called “constructive engagement," and in the long run it worked.”
This claim is utterly false. In fact, the UN and the British Commonwealth countries were already moving towards sanctions under the leadership of countries like India, Australia, and New Zealand, very much against the wishes of Reagan and British Conservatine Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. In 1986, the US Congress passed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act imposing strong sanctions on South Africa. The Senate had to override Reagan’s veto. It was these sanctions, combined with strong measures by other nations including sanctions and sporting boycotts that brought about the fall of Apartheid, not Reagan’s milquetoast policy.
When America says human rights. The first is the right to solitary isolation , for your own dammm good we are told. Also you have the right to a needle full of killing poison, we call those vexxxines. What other rights would you want?
MY reply is going to vex people and I do not care.
Polio was endemic in Sri Lanka where I was born (I am white colonialist baby). My sister (before the vaccine had a mild form of Polio/I had the fever. Many of my friends died.
"Polio" was caused by pesticides such as DDT and gammexane. You can be absolutely certain that the farmers of Sri Lanka were poisoned by these toxins. Of course, it entered into the drinking water and all foods.
As soon as they banned DDT in the USA, the cases of "Polio" collapsed. A bit later, they came up with the fake vaccine.
Kindly do your own research. You have been thoroughly brainwashed.
I’m a retired biochemist/molecular geneticist. On what evidence are you basing your views about vaccines? I’m familar with a lot of the literature, and I don’t see any support for your wild claims. There are good summaries of some of the incorrect ideas about vaccines here:
No one has ever isolated a virus. That is why when "virologists" want to find a "virus", they never have a sample from a healthy person next to the one from the sick person. If they did exactly the same operations on both samples, they would find on the electron microscope identical fragments of proteins and cellular debris that they call "viruses"
It is a massive fraud that allows pharmaceutical companies to make massive profits. They poison people with vaccines so that they get chronic diseases that need medications. These medications never cure anyone.
I am 75. I was born in Egypt. I took one or two vaccines as a kid. For over 50 years, I have avoided all vaccines and I am healthy. I have not seen a doctor for any organic problem for over 50 years. I am the same weight as 50 years ago.
Doctors never study people like me because we are the living proof that they are sadistic, psychopathic charlatans.
That is complete nonsense. I’m a retired biochemist/molecular geneticist with many years of research experience. In research, we used bacterial viruses (called ‘bacteriophage’) as tools for cloning and sequencing DNA and RNA from organisms including bacteria, fruit flies, mice, and humans. I frequently isolated bacterial viruses containing nucleic acid inserts of interest. Isolation of many viruses in laboratories is routine.
This older article will give you an idea of some basic methods that can be used to isolate purified virus particles:
Well, since you think your qualification is important. I have a first degree in civil engineering. And a higher degree in Operations Research. I have worked in the software field for over 30 years. I can detect logical fallacies with ease. There is nothing more fraudulent than virology and Germ Theory
Alfred, the scientific consensus on virus existence isn’t based on faith or assumption - it’s built on reproducible experimental evidence that anyone can verify using established protocols.
There’s no doubt everything we see on YouTube/Rumble has been produced by committed people with an agenda. Scientists don’t tend to use those platforms to forward their findings.
The hallmark of the scientific method is reproducibility - the ability for independent researchers to get the same results. Scientific claims must be backed by empirical evidence that can be independently verified, not just skepticism or doubt alone.
Alfred, I think you misunderstood me. My qualifications are important here only because they show that I have relevant, advanced training and knowledge. As I went on to explain, I have *personally* isolated viruses on many occasions, and used them as research tools, something that should be impossible according to you.
I note that your qualifications, while admirable, do not appear to be relevant to this area. And you obviously have no experience in the study or use of viruses, or you simply would not make these bizarrely wrong claims.
As for Dr Judy Mikovits, the evidence shows that her outlandish views have been repeatedly debunked. Here are just a couple of sources (among many). I’ve also included a link debunking Dr Adrew Kaufman’s pseudoscience.
Fake Science: XMRV, COVID-19, and the Toxic Legacy of Dr. Judy Mikovits
Back in the early 80's, we were told that half of the population of South Africa would soon die because HIV was raging through the Black community. That the mines would be abandoned due to the prevalence of this "infection" by a deadly disease.
Since then, the population of South Africa has doubled. And there never was a shortage of Black miners.
If you don't recognise a scam when it is so obvious, I really cannot help you.
The fact is that HIV tests are not standard. One can be positive in one country and negative in another.
AZT was used by Fauci to kill a vast number of homosexuals in the West. The Covid-19 scam is almost a copy of the HIV scam. In the recent fake pandemic, they used Remdesivir to kill off people so as to get more publicity.
Absolutely correct that the West literally weaponized the concept of human rights. The West didn’t just lend financial and political support to dissidents and rebels in target countries. In some cases it justified military action against a country ostensibly for human right reasons.
Example 1, Serbia/Yugoslavia, 1999
To “prevent genocide in Kosovo,” NATO forces bombed Belgrade for 3 months.
Example 2, Afghanistan, 2001
After the fall of the Taliban, US/NATO forces justified their occupation (and constant military action) on the basis that they were protecting human rights, particularly for women.
Example 3, Libya, 2011
NATO claimed that Libyan government forces were raping their way through the population, and that their nine-month bombing campaign was to protect human rights.
Example 4… you get the idea.
The advantage of claiming human rights reasons as justification for military action is the perfect cover for imperialism. NO nation is free of human rights abuses. Thus every country (save their own) is vulnerable to the accusation and a military campaign claimed to be intended to end it. This vicious and corrupting abuse of human rights hit its apogee around 1999 with the advent of R2P - the “Right To Protect.” This attempted to codify the right of nations to conduct military actions, including a full-on invasion, supposedly for human rights reasons. The obvious risk of abuse of the principle by Western powers was, of course, ignored.
There is no greater abuser of human rights than war. No other force comes close, in fact. Therefore it’s difficult to imagine a more cynical viewpoint than saying you’re making war on that basis. You’re not, you’re doing it for other reasons and merely using human rights as the justification.
"...If this world has a future, it is as a socialist society…a society where nobody has priorities just because he happens to come from a rich family.”
This. The pretend concern of the West has been revealed. The capitalists have never cared about human rights. Just profits over people.
Amnesty briefly flirted with a campaign dealing with economic and cultural rights c.2009 but it was "controversial" and rapidly sidelined before being forgotten.
The people of the Soviet Union wanted the same consumerist distractions the West offered - Levi’s, Mcdonalds, Walkman, Hollywood movies. My friend grew up in the DDR and once lamented that 21st century Berlin was a city more divided than ever - between rich and poor. “In the East, we had very little, but everyone was equal…” He said. “Nobody was homeless.”
I would second that completely- a definite history lesson to understanding that the so called 'collapse of communism of the Soviet system' was not quite what it seems or what current histrionics of the anti communist/socialist neo liberal elites and their mouthpieces would have us believe. Kit has done a great job in exposing the subversive impact of Western soft power in the last two decades of the twentieth century on the demise of the Soviet system and its socialist heritage.
The anti-American CIA has been behind so much of the treasonous activity in the world collaborating with Britains MI6 in its war on humanity.
Two organizations founded by the CIA come to mind for the "culture wars" of the 1950s through the 1970s.
They were the Frankfurt School and the Congress for Cultural Freedom: Neo-Liberal institutions based on 'anti-authoritarianism' to promote the rock, sex, drug counterculture in Western societies. The breeding ground for billionaire George Soros' Open Society NGOs.
I knew there was some dastardly shenanigans going on, I mean Black Sabbath didn’t come out of nowhere. Of course acid was introduced to destroy the hippies but they ended loving it, and the sex oh the sex, it was THE secret weapon in the war on humanity.
Makes one wonder why the fuck the Soviets agreed to sign such a blatantly subversive accord.
Also makes one equally wonder why there weren't any mass fucking uprisings by the people once they saw what shock therapy and so-called 'western liberal values' had done to them.
Maybe it was some kind of MKULTRA-developed mass mind fog weapon. It would explain a lot, especially as it's clearly still in use today.
People can be so fucking stupid, can't they? That's the real problem. Until that is fixed, there is zero hope.
Can Capitalists who regard everything and everybody as a commodity, with a price tag attached, be human? This is a seminal internal contradiction and the glaring alienation...
Solidarity, brother. You seem to have ran a forensic audit on the velvet glove and found the brass knuckles inside—then had the nerve to print the receipts.
Most writers would rather chase blue-check applause than chase the money trail from Langley to Gdańsk.
We hope you keep swinging; the small band who still care about actual history is reading.
"Human rights" is simply a stick for the West to beat countries that it doesn't like, while ignoring far worse acts by western countries and their pets.
The memo sent to Rex Tillerson lays it out in black and white.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/19/tillerson-state-human-rights-304118
Brian Hook claimed in that memo to Tillerson that “Reagan's first instinct was always to back allies against adversaries, even in controversial cases, including through his second term. South Africa would be an excellent example. The approach used there was called “constructive engagement," and in the long run it worked.”
This claim is utterly false. In fact, the UN and the British Commonwealth countries were already moving towards sanctions under the leadership of countries like India, Australia, and New Zealand, very much against the wishes of Reagan and British Conservatine Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. In 1986, the US Congress passed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act imposing strong sanctions on South Africa. The Senate had to override Reagan’s veto. It was these sanctions, combined with strong measures by other nations including sanctions and sporting boycotts that brought about the fall of Apartheid, not Reagan’s milquetoast policy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Anti-Apartheid_Act
When America says human rights. The first is the right to solitary isolation , for your own dammm good we are told. Also you have the right to a needle full of killing poison, we call those vexxxines. What other rights would you want?
I had two folks saying how great vexxxines are. How they saved millions of lives, how I am ignorant of science, sic.
My housemate is vexxxines injured and slowly dying.
There are dead and injured in the building since the scamdemic, numbering a high proportion of the population.
God created science.
Vexxxines are the opposite of science.
It's the best way to let the morons eliminate and sterilize themselves.
I'm anti mandates, but pro freedom to choose whatever stupid toxic treatment one wants for their real or not conditions.
Hide yer kids.....
MY reply is going to vex people and I do not care.
Polio was endemic in Sri Lanka where I was born (I am white colonialist baby). My sister (before the vaccine had a mild form of Polio/I had the fever. Many of my friends died.
You have never in the USA seen Smallpox.
Neither have you seen Typhoid o Yellow Fever.
It is coming to the USA
"Polio" was caused by pesticides such as DDT and gammexane. You can be absolutely certain that the farmers of Sri Lanka were poisoned by these toxins. Of course, it entered into the drinking water and all foods.
As soon as they banned DDT in the USA, the cases of "Polio" collapsed. A bit later, they came up with the fake vaccine.
Kindly do your own research. You have been thoroughly brainwashed.
I am hoping Kit will do some reporting on these so-called vexxxines.....when you can...
Hi Grasshopper Kaplan
I’m a retired biochemist/molecular geneticist. On what evidence are you basing your views about vaccines? I’m familar with a lot of the literature, and I don’t see any support for your wild claims. There are good summaries of some of the incorrect ideas about vaccines here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_misinformation
And specifically for Covid vaccines, here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccine_misinformation_and_hesitancy
Your ignorant anti-science comment about vaccines is disgusting.
Anti science?
Vaccines are the ones that get full legal immunity.
How is that scientific?
Did you get your 10+ boosters?
Be sure to get the new RSV shot.
I hear it's a doozy.
No one has ever isolated a virus. That is why when "virologists" want to find a "virus", they never have a sample from a healthy person next to the one from the sick person. If they did exactly the same operations on both samples, they would find on the electron microscope identical fragments of proteins and cellular debris that they call "viruses"
It is a massive fraud that allows pharmaceutical companies to make massive profits. They poison people with vaccines so that they get chronic diseases that need medications. These medications never cure anyone.
I am 75. I was born in Egypt. I took one or two vaccines as a kid. For over 50 years, I have avoided all vaccines and I am healthy. I have not seen a doctor for any organic problem for over 50 years. I am the same weight as 50 years ago.
Doctors never study people like me because we are the living proof that they are sadistic, psychopathic charlatans.
That is complete nonsense. I’m a retired biochemist/molecular geneticist with many years of research experience. In research, we used bacterial viruses (called ‘bacteriophage’) as tools for cloning and sequencing DNA and RNA from organisms including bacteria, fruit flies, mice, and humans. I frequently isolated bacterial viruses containing nucleic acid inserts of interest. Isolation of many viruses in laboratories is routine.
This older article will give you an idea of some basic methods that can be used to isolate purified virus particles:
PROPAGATION OF VIRUSES | Animal
Steffen Faisst
Encyclopedia of Virology (Second Edition)
1999, Pages 1408-1413
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0122270304002363?ref=pdf_download&fr=RR-9&rr=976033357a8176e4
Well, since you think your qualification is important. I have a first degree in civil engineering. And a higher degree in Operations Research. I have worked in the software field for over 30 years. I can detect logical fallacies with ease. There is nothing more fraudulent than virology and Germ Theory
I suggest you watch these:
"𝗗𝗼 𝗩𝗶𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗘𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁? 𝗧𝗵𝗲 '𝗧𝗼𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁' 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝘆 𝗠𝗶𝗸𝗼𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘀 & 𝗗𝗿. 𝗔𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘄 𝗞𝗮𝘂𝗳𝗺𝗮𝗻"
https://rumble.com/v6vfjg5-do-viruses-really-exist-the-towards-the-light-show-with-dr.-judy-mikovits-a.html
https://rumble.com/v3arlye-dr.-sam-bailey-allopathic-medicine-is-the-killing-fields-of-humanity-dr.-sa.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LC9qkKd3dI
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-unvaccinated-proof-of-what-we
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/quick-update-found-on-a-pediatricians
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sudden-deaths-incapacitations-soar-among-covid-jabbed-airline-pilots-report/
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/vaccines-mercury-and-autism-cdc-and
Alfred, the scientific consensus on virus existence isn’t based on faith or assumption - it’s built on reproducible experimental evidence that anyone can verify using established protocols.
There’s no doubt everything we see on YouTube/Rumble has been produced by committed people with an agenda. Scientists don’t tend to use those platforms to forward their findings.
The hallmark of the scientific method is reproducibility - the ability for independent researchers to get the same results. Scientific claims must be backed by empirical evidence that can be independently verified, not just skepticism or doubt alone.
The "consensus" got 270 million Americans to take the toxic Covid-19 bioweapon. Please stop wasting my time.
Germ theory is a fraud. Perpetuated by the Rockfellers et al.
Alfred, I think you misunderstood me. My qualifications are important here only because they show that I have relevant, advanced training and knowledge. As I went on to explain, I have *personally* isolated viruses on many occasions, and used them as research tools, something that should be impossible according to you.
I note that your qualifications, while admirable, do not appear to be relevant to this area. And you obviously have no experience in the study or use of viruses, or you simply would not make these bizarrely wrong claims.
As for Dr Judy Mikovits, the evidence shows that her outlandish views have been repeatedly debunked. Here are just a couple of sources (among many). I’ve also included a link debunking Dr Adrew Kaufman’s pseudoscience.
Fake Science: XMRV, COVID-19, and the Toxic Legacy of Dr. Judy Mikovits
Neil et al. (2020)
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/aid.2020.0095
Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist attacking Anthony Fauci in a viral conspiracy video
In Plandemic, the former chronic fatigue syndrome researcher makes countless unsubstantiated claims and accusations
Science (2020)
https://www.science.org/content/article/fact-checking-judy-mikovits-controversial-virologist-attacking-anthony-fauci-viral
Dr Andrew Kaufman
The Psychiatrist Who Calmly Denies Reality
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/psychiatrist-who-calmly-denies-reality
Back in the early 80's, we were told that half of the population of South Africa would soon die because HIV was raging through the Black community. That the mines would be abandoned due to the prevalence of this "infection" by a deadly disease.
Since then, the population of South Africa has doubled. And there never was a shortage of Black miners.
If you don't recognise a scam when it is so obvious, I really cannot help you.
The fact is that HIV tests are not standard. One can be positive in one country and negative in another.
AZT was used by Fauci to kill a vast number of homosexuals in the West. The Covid-19 scam is almost a copy of the HIV scam. In the recent fake pandemic, they used Remdesivir to kill off people so as to get more publicity.
Go fuck yourself😤 Vaccines have saved millions of lives.
LoL 😂 A pro-jab bot/troll! Haven't seen one of those in a while 😁🤣
Resorting to invective is proof that you are spouting BS.
Absolutely correct that the West literally weaponized the concept of human rights. The West didn’t just lend financial and political support to dissidents and rebels in target countries. In some cases it justified military action against a country ostensibly for human right reasons.
Example 1, Serbia/Yugoslavia, 1999
To “prevent genocide in Kosovo,” NATO forces bombed Belgrade for 3 months.
Example 2, Afghanistan, 2001
After the fall of the Taliban, US/NATO forces justified their occupation (and constant military action) on the basis that they were protecting human rights, particularly for women.
Example 3, Libya, 2011
NATO claimed that Libyan government forces were raping their way through the population, and that their nine-month bombing campaign was to protect human rights.
Example 4… you get the idea.
The advantage of claiming human rights reasons as justification for military action is the perfect cover for imperialism. NO nation is free of human rights abuses. Thus every country (save their own) is vulnerable to the accusation and a military campaign claimed to be intended to end it. This vicious and corrupting abuse of human rights hit its apogee around 1999 with the advent of R2P - the “Right To Protect.” This attempted to codify the right of nations to conduct military actions, including a full-on invasion, supposedly for human rights reasons. The obvious risk of abuse of the principle by Western powers was, of course, ignored.
There is no greater abuser of human rights than war. No other force comes close, in fact. Therefore it’s difficult to imagine a more cynical viewpoint than saying you’re making war on that basis. You’re not, you’re doing it for other reasons and merely using human rights as the justification.
Correct.
Look at the USA....that's all one needs to do.
"...If this world has a future, it is as a socialist society…a society where nobody has priorities just because he happens to come from a rich family.”
This. The pretend concern of the West has been revealed. The capitalists have never cared about human rights. Just profits over people.
Amnesty briefly flirted with a campaign dealing with economic and cultural rights c.2009 but it was "controversial" and rapidly sidelined before being forgotten.
The people of the Soviet Union wanted the same consumerist distractions the West offered - Levi’s, Mcdonalds, Walkman, Hollywood movies. My friend grew up in the DDR and once lamented that 21st century Berlin was a city more divided than ever - between rich and poor. “In the East, we had very little, but everyone was equal…” He said. “Nobody was homeless.”
A hugely inportant history, and well framed - thanks for doing this!
I would second that completely- a definite history lesson to understanding that the so called 'collapse of communism of the Soviet system' was not quite what it seems or what current histrionics of the anti communist/socialist neo liberal elites and their mouthpieces would have us believe. Kit has done a great job in exposing the subversive impact of Western soft power in the last two decades of the twentieth century on the demise of the Soviet system and its socialist heritage.
Excellent article.
Cheers Stephen!!!
America has become itself an insult to Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms.”
I remember how ridiculed Jimmy Carter was for emphasizing human rights in international politics.
When I was a kid domestic rights were taken quite seriously. That's completely gone now.
I had a funny feeling about Solzhenitsyn especially cause that puppet Jordan Peterson loved him.
Turns out the guy was a phony.
https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/i-was-solzhenitsyn-a-fraud-and-a
IF anyone in the USA takes the time to read: Cancer Ward.
The anti-American CIA has been behind so much of the treasonous activity in the world collaborating with Britains MI6 in its war on humanity.
Two organizations founded by the CIA come to mind for the "culture wars" of the 1950s through the 1970s.
They were the Frankfurt School and the Congress for Cultural Freedom: Neo-Liberal institutions based on 'anti-authoritarianism' to promote the rock, sex, drug counterculture in Western societies. The breeding ground for billionaire George Soros' Open Society NGOs.
I knew there was some dastardly shenanigans going on, I mean Black Sabbath didn’t come out of nowhere. Of course acid was introduced to destroy the hippies but they ended loving it, and the sex oh the sex, it was THE secret weapon in the war on humanity.
Makes one wonder why the fuck the Soviets agreed to sign such a blatantly subversive accord.
Also makes one equally wonder why there weren't any mass fucking uprisings by the people once they saw what shock therapy and so-called 'western liberal values' had done to them.
Maybe it was some kind of MKULTRA-developed mass mind fog weapon. It would explain a lot, especially as it's clearly still in use today.
People can be so fucking stupid, can't they? That's the real problem. Until that is fixed, there is zero hope.
Can Capitalists who regard everything and everybody as a commodity, with a price tag attached, be human? This is a seminal internal contradiction and the glaring alienation...
On and on it goes! Venezuela and Colombia now.
Solidarity, brother. You seem to have ran a forensic audit on the velvet glove and found the brass knuckles inside—then had the nerve to print the receipts.
Most writers would rather chase blue-check applause than chase the money trail from Langley to Gdańsk.
We hope you keep swinging; the small band who still care about actual history is reading.