Yes, thanks Kit. JJA and Allen Dulles were clearly involved deeply in the JFK assassination. Thanks for this piece. I just wish Americans would opt for painful truths over the comforting lies that they seem to prefer. The US has not been "the good guys" for a very, very long time.
As the Dog once wrote: "America was never innocent. We popped our cherry on the boat over and looked back with no regrets. You can't ascribe our fall from grace to any single event or set of circumstances. You can't lose what you lacked at conception. Mass-market nostalgia gets you hopped up for a past that never existed. Hagiography sanctifies shuck-and-jive politicians and reinvents their expedient gestures as moments of great moral weight."
It wasn’t in 1916 but 2 years later it was (the most irresponsible, evil decision by any country in 2000 years in my opinion). But it got America in on our side, and the whole British govt want that keen on giving away Palestine anyway.
Angleton's very documented special relation with Israel is all the more ironic if you consider his implication, as a CIC man, in the ratlines running through Rome to help nazi criminals escape justice. He was then known as James O'Brien, if memory serves. Thanks for the piece anyway.
Barbie was a counter-intelligence, torture specialist and one of the above-mentioned CIC escapees (not sure whether good ol' James Jesus had anything to do with it though) to South America. Before that, he had been used in his own country, in various capacities, by his own people (RUSTY) and the US (ZACABAL and BGHABIT). I doubt he was of very much use to Israel after he left for the Americas (and before that, Mossad did not exist). As for Skorzeny, he was no spy and also a very lousy commando. He was just the right man at the right place at the right time for nazi / SS propaganda (if you want to read something that will enlighten you as to the gap between the real Skorzeny and Skorzeny the legend, have a look at the excellent 'Rescuing Mussolini' by Robert Forczyk, everything else about the man's life is but a rehashing of that initial lie, greatly helped by the mainstream media of past times). It's true that he worked for the Israelis at some point (between 61 and 64) but in an intelligence capacity mostly. He was at the time quite the socialite in Madrid, which was a hub for all things german / unrepentant nazis. Thus he hosted many people at his home and dealt with a lot of people at his offices. And good Germans, especially the ones the Egyptians were using for their weapons / missile programs regaled him with stories and anecdotes about what they were doing, because they trusted him. Always the Hitler fanboy, Skorzeny was above suspicion, or so they thought. I believe he helped Mossad bug his dwellings and delivered a lot of intel that way. But they certainly didn't need him to train them in the dark arts. By that time, they had learned all they needed from the Brits, the Yanks, probably the Frogs to some extent (as they were very cosy too), some of their citizens from the Soviet Bloc and, above all, from experience and the necessities of survival.
"Otto Skorzeny's proposals were to develop units specialised in such unconventional warfare, including partisan-like fighting deep behind enemy lines, fighting in enemy uniform, sabotage attacks, etc. In April 1943 Otto Skorzeny's name was put forward by Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the new head of the RSHA, and Otto Skorzeny met with SS-Brigadeführer Walter Schellenberg, head of Amt VI, Ausland-SD, (the SS foreign intelligence service department of the RSHA). Walter Schellenberg charged Otto Skorzeny with command of the schools organised to train operatives in sabotage, espionage, and paramilitary techniques. Otto Skorzeny was appointed commander of the recently created Waffen Sonderverband z.b.V. Friedenthal stationed near Berlin. The unit was later renamed SS Jagdverbände 502, and in November 1944 again to SS Combat Unit Centre, expanding ultimately to five battalions."
As for Barbie, he worked for the CIA. Being stationed in South America wouldn't preclude his returning to work in Egypt or Israel. Torture is something the Zionists have developed a passion for. Are we to assume that they were taught these techniques by the Brits, French and Americans?
Well, let’s just say that after six years working on the subject to build a novel around the man, exploring archives in Austria, Germany, England, the US and France, and reading countless books on him and related subjects, I have a pretty good idea who Skorzeny was. So I’m not staking anything on the one reference. I gave it to you to get you on the path to ‘revelation’, away from the fantasy you get on web mashups. If you are interested in knowing how, why and where OS got most of his partisan warfare inspiration, you should look up Bandenbekämpfung, the Brandenburgers, the Abwehr FAK and first and foremost the man who was nicknamed Skorzeny’s brain, his operations guy, ex-Brandenburger Adrian von Fölkersam (he is the real deal). And yes, Barbie probably worked for the CIA following his flight from Europe, but he was already very busy in the Americas. And as opposed to OS, who wasn’t, Barbie was a jew killer. And when it comes to torture, the French and the Brits know a thing or two. Battle of Algiers ring a bell?
I would say that it's an unwise leap of faith to assume that any member of the SS on the Eastern Front (particularly - the ‘Das Reich’ Division) wasn't a Jew Killer.
The Zionists were ALL, in some fashion, Jew Killers, in their own rite. Tony Greenstein and Lenni Brenner have both well-established the high levels of collaboration, between the Zionists, and the Third Reich - and that's not JUST during the Transfer Agreement phase, in the 30’s. There's direct involvement between the Stern Gang and the Nazis, including some correspondence between Itzhak Shamir, and Himmler, as I understand it, during the Genocide of the 1940’s.
Zionists are in REBELLION against the Almighty, and reject both the Torah, Tanakh and relevant sections of the Talmud, like Kesubos 111a. Both Herzl and Jabotinsky disliked the Torah-faithful (real) Jews of their day.
The Star falsely associated with David, is actually the Star of Remphan (aka Molech/Chiun/Saturn). It has also been called “The Seal of Solomon” - which makes sense since he is noted to have practiced all sorts of abominations and idolatry, and that's a Magickal/Occult symbol, associated with Ba’al, since long before his time, or David’s. Zionists are NOT JEWS - they are Idolators. So their collaboration with Nazis is nothing to try and minimize, since real Jews have always rejected Zionism as a Satanic Heresy, and refused to join in the Luciferian Occultist plans to gather them all in Palestine, by human means, and without Moshiach, as is required in their actual faith. https://www.jewsnotzionists.com/Historical_Documents/TheRabbisSpeakOut.htm
Lee Harvey Oswald's CIA Dallas Handler Georges De Mohrehnschildt was a Nazi Spy, anti-bolshevist royalty, and "killed himself" just before he was to testify before the House.
***
BTW The "Security and sovereignty " report by Allen Dulles is still classified.
I'm continually and repeatedly overwhelmed by the increasing factual reporting on Kennedy's assassination, 9/11, Israel, and most of all by the political Jewish leaders activities in the US. The latter form an organized conglomeration of over 400 US Jewish political organizations that spend billions of dollars annually. AIPAC is only 10% of the entire effort. Here's a list of those organizations. The list speaks for itself. https://iwasathought.substack.com/p/the-jewish-lobby .
read what I write about Angleton and Edward Jay Epstein.
Epstein interviewed George DeMohrenschildt, in a hotel room (that I believe was bugged by Angleton). DeM went home. A few hours later, a recording records a breach at the front door of the home. Then, boom. shotgun.
DeM was taken out, I talk about that in this essay
lots of good shit in that piece too about how either Mossad or CIA murdered Karen Silkwood because she had proof of diverted and missing nuclear materials [which the CIA shipped to Israel, South Africa, Brazil, and Iran]
Had DeMohrenschildt written his personal letter to Bill Colby he might be have lived longer. I just Colby would have written him back and simply told him "i'm sorry to hear you have had such bothersome contacts occuring after the recent re-emergence of the interest in JFK's assassination and the investigations ongoing relative to that. I suggest, for your own peace of mind, that you do not speak to any journalists at this time. as you know that just causes a great deal of inquiry and curiosity of the kind you enumerate in your letter. My recommendation is to avoid the vultures and then perhaps engage in activities that stimulate your mind and body--good exercise can relieve the stress, as your description indicates you've been so burdened with. My hope is that you, like the rest of us, can emerge from the ongoing interest and investigations more fully-informed, and without the kind of negative attention you've experienced."
However, DeM writes the letter directly to the CIA's great satan himself George H.W. Bush. Death Warrant. Would have lived beyond the 1970s--would not have had a shotgun forced into his mouth, he likely would have, however, told Congress whatever it was he told Epstein, which I think was DeMohrenschildt escalating his at-that-time statements:
1. J. Walton Moore of the CIA's Domestic Contacts Division advised him to meet Oswald, 'signed off' on it, 'cleared it' -- (that can be read as little as "we checked the guy out, he's safe" to "please meet this individual and develop a friendship for us" - we just don't know for sure but maybe he told Epstein for sure.
2. In Haiti for the CIA. When Oswald's CIA handler was switched to Ruth and Michael Paine, George DeM left and onto his next Agency assignment--spying-on and getting-in-good and securing a deal with Duvalier. He had admitted friendship/regular meets with CIA Chief of Station when he was down there, what else did he add to Epstein?
3. Believed Oswald was a patsy, called his manuscript "I Am A Patsy!" -- what beyond these definitive statements could he have added to Epstein?
4. Said it's ridiculous to believe that Ruby was just 'some lunatic' who shot Oswald, said it was insulting that Garrison was dubbed "another lunatic"
When you consider all of these variables, it becomes clear that he was considered 'a national security threat' (and in '64 his mail was being opened and photographed, that we learned from recent JFK doc dumps) as early as 1964, and his later statements would only have enflamed that.
Consider, too, that Epstein claims he has no recording of the interview. What journalist worth his bacon PAYS someone for an interview and then does not record and transcribe it? Says he has absolutely nothing from the interview and can't remember w/e --- this was the big signal to me that Epstein was complicit for his answers make zero sense for a journalist. He could have forged a tighter excuse that would have evaded later researchers and autists studying this.
Then, when you learn just how cozy Epstein and Angleton became--regular dinners together, Angleton talking "out of school" [agency stuff] to an outsider, meaning, he was using Epstein as a conduit to deliver that information such as in his Epstein's 1978 book Legend (pub. just under one year after DeM murder,) -- where Angleton is basically the primary source for the book's 'new' material, wherein Epstein launders the CIA's garbage relative to a 'USSR/CUBA-did-it' angle, Was Epstein doing here for Angleton what his and Joannides/Shackley's assets in the DRE did? As Morley writes that in less than an hour after JFK's assassination these Cuban exiles who have this thick dossier on Oswald, to include even an LP/record of Oswald's "pro-Cuba" debate performance--they are calling up all their media sources offering the thick dossier, along with even audio recordings and video of Oswald. They had a full "media package" on him ready to deploy. So with that, you see that the CIA used these assets in the past on the JFK case and then it's obvious that Epstein was being used to do the same thing, float that CIA narrative.
If I were James Angleton, I know that I would have taken out every single person from the three assassination waves we saw occur post-Dallas. Waves 1, 2, and 3 all coinciding with investigations. I obviously could not do such a job, but point being when you put yourself in their shoes, and dispassionately ask "okay so what do I do?" -- the answer is you use 'the mechanism' (described by Seymour Hersh) developed by the CIA after the Agency found they had an institutional need for an official policy and procedure in-place.
The only way you stop those congressional inquiries is if that witness either changes his mind or has his mind backspattered all over the wall of a townhouse so the committee learns nothing from the individual who is a liability.
Or, as in the case of Johnny Roselli, your very dangerous witness puts his hands up and says "you got me" as he stuff himself inside of a barrel (or however that actually went down...)
for sure. follow my page for lots of essays on OKC bombing. I possess all of the Nichols Defense Team's documents (unredacted) and thus have a shitload of primary sources that I plumb then release then to piss off the FBI, inform the public, and an essay to go-with it to outline to the reader why I think it's important. To that end, my essays on OKC often use never before seen documents that came straight from the trials
the above story I posted, I veered away from OKC, only because it is absolutely huge that we currently have--per a 20+ year veteran whose father was Brigade 2506--a domestic assassination program that kill U.S. citizens without trial, today. And it's not the "kill list" / "disposition" matrix that Anwar al-Awlaki was put on.
al-Awlaki was the only U.S. citizen assassinated by the kill list program, which used a drone, meanwhile, this other program that I write about has killed > 1 U.S. citizens and per the words of the guy who is aware of it these people just "poof - disappear" -- so it's certainly not the "kill list" which makes it worse, and my speculation of course is this is the same mechanism used by the CIA In the 50s and 60s and 70s to murder the JFK witnesses.
the story I think alludes to the fact that entire time since Church Committee, those reforms enacted meant diddly, because the assassination program continued and THAT solidified my concerns about Allan [heart attack gun/dart mechanism] Francovich and Michael Hastings are correct--they were killed.
Whole list of OKC people on that same list. I suspect that Officer Terry Yeakey might have been taken out by this team, as well as Dr. Don Chumley and Michael Loudenslager.
I think it’s ridiculously not believable and that it doesn’t add up to how a professional intelligence organization operates
I know that if indeed we had some JFK shooter in jail, my choice as Operations officer would be secure a prison-fight/murder to shut him the fuck up, or better yet, introduce a toxin that kills but looks like a heart attack and that hasn’t happened so…
That was my thought as well. He seems like a Forrest Gump figure. His finger is in too many pies, so to speak. He knows too many of the players to have actually survived as long as he did.
when you read in The Devil’s Chessboard … so many moments of “WAIT BRUH REWIND” or “flips back page violently” in that book. Such as how Angleton and top deputies would go to Allen Dulles’ home and brief him—every one of them in violation of secrecy oaths doing that, all felonies—and many months after being fired by JFK.
When I saw that I was like “holy shit, so JFK fires these guys and they just pivot their meetings to Dulles’ house, he’s still told everything, and still directs the Agency”
Angleton and Dulles are my top 2. With Dulles the Executive who may have recruited some other executives into the plot (certain he brought LBJ on board when he visited LBJ’s ranch a week or so prior). Assuredly Dulles would’ve been aware of LBJ’s personality type, what makes him tick, what would be offensive to him and what would not. Assuredly as well Dulles would have ‘let slip’ or otherwise said something akin to “well we’re all just glad that Bobby Baker & Billie Estes thing didn’t bring you down. We’re counting on you.”
I strongly suspect that Oswald was initially part of one or two operations relative to analysis of Soviet capabilities, analysis of Soviet defection procedures—they wanted to find out what it was the Soviets would’ve asked defectors, wanted to also find out what they might know or ask re U-2, and importantly what they DO NOT ask. After he does that, I think he fulfilled his role for CIA. He wrote a report for them on the radio factor, was debriefed by Andy Anderson in Domestic Contacts division, had the whole thing paid for by the U.S. gov via cut-outs and Red Cross, may even have been taught some tradecraft.
I believe the plot’s skeleton and operational outline began in 1962, and that it was assuredly suggested in 1961 this be the next move when Dulles was fired. Then during that period you’ve got William K. Harvey and the Miami JM/WAVE station basically establishing their assassination cadres and methods, planning everything assuredly took more than a year, and I think Angleton is best candidate for selecting the patsy, from his files—a person who ticks all the right boxes—and that picked two names for two differing locations: Thomas Arthur Vallee if Chicago, Lee Harvey Oswald if Dallas, and for a short time, Lee Harvey Oswald if Washington, D.C. which was indeed a plot and for a short period of time Oswald is saying/writing he’ll be in D.C.
They probably had 3-4 different cities as targets, inserted assets in all of them. The PD assuredly had CIA assets embedded in it: Captain Westbrook and Roscoe White in Dallas. Then when they did RFK, Hank Hernandez and Manny Pena heading up the investigation for LAPD.
It's insane that after all this time, they still act like Oswald did it.
BTW Kit, heard you on grayzone and it was hard to make out the audio.... Can you please get a simple mic to use? You don't need anything fancy but whatever you're using is really poor quality. It sounds like dial up quality audio of the 90s. 😂
The *only* people nowadays who maintain Oswald killed JFK are the CIA and its subsidiaries. If the Chinese or Russians or New Zealanders ever want to know if someone is CIA, I suggest they innocently raise the topic in casual conversation as to who killed JFK.
And of course Angleton is either buried in this Israel or he has a memorial stone in his name there. Either way there are enough Israeli fanatics around, enough to make a difference if they just happened to be placed in the right position. Recall our own psychotic Orde Wingate who was in Palestine before he was dispatched to Burma?
Yes, thanks Kit. JJA and Allen Dulles were clearly involved deeply in the JFK assassination. Thanks for this piece. I just wish Americans would opt for painful truths over the comforting lies that they seem to prefer. The US has not been "the good guys" for a very, very long time.
As the Dog once wrote: "America was never innocent. We popped our cherry on the boat over and looked back with no regrets. You can't ascribe our fall from grace to any single event or set of circumstances. You can't lose what you lacked at conception. Mass-market nostalgia gets you hopped up for a past that never existed. Hagiography sanctifies shuck-and-jive politicians and reinvents their expedient gestures as moments of great moral weight."
James G Angleton and Alan Dulles planned , executed and covered up the JFK assassination.
Philip Zelikow and Dick Cheney performed the same role in the 9/11 psyop, with the Saudi Hijackers playing the same role as Lee Harvey
Oswald. ..patsies.
Kash Patel is running the Charlie Kirk coverup on behalf of his boss in Tel Aviv. Tyler Robinson is an obvious Patsie.
"Palestine was hardly Britain's to give away"
- John F. Kennedy
It wasn’t in 1916 but 2 years later it was (the most irresponsible, evil decision by any country in 2000 years in my opinion). But it got America in on our side, and the whole British govt want that keen on giving away Palestine anyway.
"They follow the Hitler line - no matter how big the lie - repeat it often enough and the masses will regard it as the truth."
- John F. Kennedy
Would Israel assassinate someone? Great work KK.
"Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the State."
- James Angleton, former Chief of the CIA's counterintelligence (CI) staff, who was promoted by Dulles.
***
Angleton oversaw domestic spying activities under Operation "Chaos", which targeted anti-war and civil rights movements.
BTW in Tel Aviv, there's a huge statue to James Angleton.
That's all you need to know bout Mossad/CIA relationship..
Angleton's very documented special relation with Israel is all the more ironic if you consider his implication, as a CIC man, in the ratlines running through Rome to help nazi criminals escape justice. He was then known as James O'Brien, if memory serves. Thanks for the piece anyway.
It's reasonably certain the Otto Skorzeny and perhaps even Klaus Barbi, or some others, actually trained the Mossad in the dark arts of the Nazis.
Barbie was a counter-intelligence, torture specialist and one of the above-mentioned CIC escapees (not sure whether good ol' James Jesus had anything to do with it though) to South America. Before that, he had been used in his own country, in various capacities, by his own people (RUSTY) and the US (ZACABAL and BGHABIT). I doubt he was of very much use to Israel after he left for the Americas (and before that, Mossad did not exist). As for Skorzeny, he was no spy and also a very lousy commando. He was just the right man at the right place at the right time for nazi / SS propaganda (if you want to read something that will enlighten you as to the gap between the real Skorzeny and Skorzeny the legend, have a look at the excellent 'Rescuing Mussolini' by Robert Forczyk, everything else about the man's life is but a rehashing of that initial lie, greatly helped by the mainstream media of past times). It's true that he worked for the Israelis at some point (between 61 and 64) but in an intelligence capacity mostly. He was at the time quite the socialite in Madrid, which was a hub for all things german / unrepentant nazis. Thus he hosted many people at his home and dealt with a lot of people at his offices. And good Germans, especially the ones the Egyptians were using for their weapons / missile programs regaled him with stories and anecdotes about what they were doing, because they trusted him. Always the Hitler fanboy, Skorzeny was above suspicion, or so they thought. I believe he helped Mossad bug his dwellings and delivered a lot of intel that way. But they certainly didn't need him to train them in the dark arts. By that time, they had learned all they needed from the Brits, the Yanks, probably the Frogs to some extent (as they were very cosy too), some of their citizens from the Soviet Bloc and, above all, from experience and the necessities of survival.
I'm not sure how.much stake we should put into one source.
https://www.wehrmacht-history.com/personnel/s/skorzeny-otto-waffen-ss-personnel-file.html
"Otto Skorzeny's proposals were to develop units specialised in such unconventional warfare, including partisan-like fighting deep behind enemy lines, fighting in enemy uniform, sabotage attacks, etc. In April 1943 Otto Skorzeny's name was put forward by Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the new head of the RSHA, and Otto Skorzeny met with SS-Brigadeführer Walter Schellenberg, head of Amt VI, Ausland-SD, (the SS foreign intelligence service department of the RSHA). Walter Schellenberg charged Otto Skorzeny with command of the schools organised to train operatives in sabotage, espionage, and paramilitary techniques. Otto Skorzeny was appointed commander of the recently created Waffen Sonderverband z.b.V. Friedenthal stationed near Berlin. The unit was later renamed SS Jagdverbände 502, and in November 1944 again to SS Combat Unit Centre, expanding ultimately to five battalions."
As for Barbie, he worked for the CIA. Being stationed in South America wouldn't preclude his returning to work in Egypt or Israel. Torture is something the Zionists have developed a passion for. Are we to assume that they were taught these techniques by the Brits, French and Americans?
Well, let’s just say that after six years working on the subject to build a novel around the man, exploring archives in Austria, Germany, England, the US and France, and reading countless books on him and related subjects, I have a pretty good idea who Skorzeny was. So I’m not staking anything on the one reference. I gave it to you to get you on the path to ‘revelation’, away from the fantasy you get on web mashups. If you are interested in knowing how, why and where OS got most of his partisan warfare inspiration, you should look up Bandenbekämpfung, the Brandenburgers, the Abwehr FAK and first and foremost the man who was nicknamed Skorzeny’s brain, his operations guy, ex-Brandenburger Adrian von Fölkersam (he is the real deal). And yes, Barbie probably worked for the CIA following his flight from Europe, but he was already very busy in the Americas. And as opposed to OS, who wasn’t, Barbie was a jew killer. And when it comes to torture, the French and the Brits know a thing or two. Battle of Algiers ring a bell?
I would say that it's an unwise leap of faith to assume that any member of the SS on the Eastern Front (particularly - the ‘Das Reich’ Division) wasn't a Jew Killer.
The Zionists were ALL, in some fashion, Jew Killers, in their own rite. Tony Greenstein and Lenni Brenner have both well-established the high levels of collaboration, between the Zionists, and the Third Reich - and that's not JUST during the Transfer Agreement phase, in the 30’s. There's direct involvement between the Stern Gang and the Nazis, including some correspondence between Itzhak Shamir, and Himmler, as I understand it, during the Genocide of the 1940’s.
Zionists are in REBELLION against the Almighty, and reject both the Torah, Tanakh and relevant sections of the Talmud, like Kesubos 111a. Both Herzl and Jabotinsky disliked the Torah-faithful (real) Jews of their day.
The Star falsely associated with David, is actually the Star of Remphan (aka Molech/Chiun/Saturn). It has also been called “The Seal of Solomon” - which makes sense since he is noted to have practiced all sorts of abominations and idolatry, and that's a Magickal/Occult symbol, associated with Ba’al, since long before his time, or David’s. Zionists are NOT JEWS - they are Idolators. So their collaboration with Nazis is nothing to try and minimize, since real Jews have always rejected Zionism as a Satanic Heresy, and refused to join in the Luciferian Occultist plans to gather them all in Palestine, by human means, and without Moshiach, as is required in their actual faith. https://www.jewsnotzionists.com/Historical_Documents/TheRabbisSpeakOut.htm
Kennedy fired Alan Dulles and when he was assassinated, who was running the Warren Commission? Alan Dulles.
***
Read "Devil's chessboard" by David Talbot, it's all there.
youtube.com/watch?v=F1bbdOgIzrI
***
Lee Harvey Oswald's CIA Dallas Handler Georges De Mohrehnschildt was a Nazi Spy, anti-bolshevist royalty, and "killed himself" just before he was to testify before the House.
***
BTW The "Security and sovereignty " report by Allen Dulles is still classified.
I've read "The Devil's Chessboard". Allen Dulles was a traitor.
George Carlin - where do corrupt politicians come from:
youtube.com/shorts/qBwfSmUrJ04
George, The Man!
The GOAT!
I'm continually and repeatedly overwhelmed by the increasing factual reporting on Kennedy's assassination, 9/11, Israel, and most of all by the political Jewish leaders activities in the US. The latter form an organized conglomeration of over 400 US Jewish political organizations that spend billions of dollars annually. AIPAC is only 10% of the entire effort. Here's a list of those organizations. The list speaks for itself. https://iwasathought.substack.com/p/the-jewish-lobby .
and then there was Ruth Paine, who was linked to the Forbes family via her husband...
read what I write about Angleton and Edward Jay Epstein.
Epstein interviewed George DeMohrenschildt, in a hotel room (that I believe was bugged by Angleton). DeM went home. A few hours later, a recording records a breach at the front door of the home. Then, boom. shotgun.
DeM was taken out, I talk about that in this essay
https://okcfacts.substack.com/p/20-year-us-army-counterintelligence
WOW! Thanks for this!
lots of good shit in that piece too about how either Mossad or CIA murdered Karen Silkwood because she had proof of diverted and missing nuclear materials [which the CIA shipped to Israel, South Africa, Brazil, and Iran]
NOTE: Supposedly Angleton is fired in Dec ‘75
biiiiiiig fucking problem with that. look at Emma-North Best’s pieces about Angleton on muckracker[dot]com
he was there at least 2 years more as a consultant
to finish the god damn HSCA cleanup that’s why
And no doubt conniving to get rid of Colby!
Had DeMohrenschildt written his personal letter to Bill Colby he might be have lived longer. I just Colby would have written him back and simply told him "i'm sorry to hear you have had such bothersome contacts occuring after the recent re-emergence of the interest in JFK's assassination and the investigations ongoing relative to that. I suggest, for your own peace of mind, that you do not speak to any journalists at this time. as you know that just causes a great deal of inquiry and curiosity of the kind you enumerate in your letter. My recommendation is to avoid the vultures and then perhaps engage in activities that stimulate your mind and body--good exercise can relieve the stress, as your description indicates you've been so burdened with. My hope is that you, like the rest of us, can emerge from the ongoing interest and investigations more fully-informed, and without the kind of negative attention you've experienced."
However, DeM writes the letter directly to the CIA's great satan himself George H.W. Bush. Death Warrant. Would have lived beyond the 1970s--would not have had a shotgun forced into his mouth, he likely would have, however, told Congress whatever it was he told Epstein, which I think was DeMohrenschildt escalating his at-that-time statements:
1. J. Walton Moore of the CIA's Domestic Contacts Division advised him to meet Oswald, 'signed off' on it, 'cleared it' -- (that can be read as little as "we checked the guy out, he's safe" to "please meet this individual and develop a friendship for us" - we just don't know for sure but maybe he told Epstein for sure.
2. In Haiti for the CIA. When Oswald's CIA handler was switched to Ruth and Michael Paine, George DeM left and onto his next Agency assignment--spying-on and getting-in-good and securing a deal with Duvalier. He had admitted friendship/regular meets with CIA Chief of Station when he was down there, what else did he add to Epstein?
3. Believed Oswald was a patsy, called his manuscript "I Am A Patsy!" -- what beyond these definitive statements could he have added to Epstein?
4. Said it's ridiculous to believe that Ruby was just 'some lunatic' who shot Oswald, said it was insulting that Garrison was dubbed "another lunatic"
When you consider all of these variables, it becomes clear that he was considered 'a national security threat' (and in '64 his mail was being opened and photographed, that we learned from recent JFK doc dumps) as early as 1964, and his later statements would only have enflamed that.
Consider, too, that Epstein claims he has no recording of the interview. What journalist worth his bacon PAYS someone for an interview and then does not record and transcribe it? Says he has absolutely nothing from the interview and can't remember w/e --- this was the big signal to me that Epstein was complicit for his answers make zero sense for a journalist. He could have forged a tighter excuse that would have evaded later researchers and autists studying this.
Then, when you learn just how cozy Epstein and Angleton became--regular dinners together, Angleton talking "out of school" [agency stuff] to an outsider, meaning, he was using Epstein as a conduit to deliver that information such as in his Epstein's 1978 book Legend (pub. just under one year after DeM murder,) -- where Angleton is basically the primary source for the book's 'new' material, wherein Epstein launders the CIA's garbage relative to a 'USSR/CUBA-did-it' angle, Was Epstein doing here for Angleton what his and Joannides/Shackley's assets in the DRE did? As Morley writes that in less than an hour after JFK's assassination these Cuban exiles who have this thick dossier on Oswald, to include even an LP/record of Oswald's "pro-Cuba" debate performance--they are calling up all their media sources offering the thick dossier, along with even audio recordings and video of Oswald. They had a full "media package" on him ready to deploy. So with that, you see that the CIA used these assets in the past on the JFK case and then it's obvious that Epstein was being used to do the same thing, float that CIA narrative.
If I were James Angleton, I know that I would have taken out every single person from the three assassination waves we saw occur post-Dallas. Waves 1, 2, and 3 all coinciding with investigations. I obviously could not do such a job, but point being when you put yourself in their shoes, and dispassionately ask "okay so what do I do?" -- the answer is you use 'the mechanism' (described by Seymour Hersh) developed by the CIA after the Agency found they had an institutional need for an official policy and procedure in-place.
The only way you stop those congressional inquiries is if that witness either changes his mind or has his mind backspattered all over the wall of a townhouse so the committee learns nothing from the individual who is a liability.
Or, as in the case of Johnny Roselli, your very dangerous witness puts his hands up and says "you got me" as he stuff himself inside of a barrel (or however that actually went down...)
Thank You for sharing this.
for sure. follow my page for lots of essays on OKC bombing. I possess all of the Nichols Defense Team's documents (unredacted) and thus have a shitload of primary sources that I plumb then release then to piss off the FBI, inform the public, and an essay to go-with it to outline to the reader why I think it's important. To that end, my essays on OKC often use never before seen documents that came straight from the trials
the above story I posted, I veered away from OKC, only because it is absolutely huge that we currently have--per a 20+ year veteran whose father was Brigade 2506--a domestic assassination program that kill U.S. citizens without trial, today. And it's not the "kill list" / "disposition" matrix that Anwar al-Awlaki was put on.
al-Awlaki was the only U.S. citizen assassinated by the kill list program, which used a drone, meanwhile, this other program that I write about has killed > 1 U.S. citizens and per the words of the guy who is aware of it these people just "poof - disappear" -- so it's certainly not the "kill list" which makes it worse, and my speculation of course is this is the same mechanism used by the CIA In the 50s and 60s and 70s to murder the JFK witnesses.
the story I think alludes to the fact that entire time since Church Committee, those reforms enacted meant diddly, because the assassination program continued and THAT solidified my concerns about Allan [heart attack gun/dart mechanism] Francovich and Michael Hastings are correct--they were killed.
Whole list of OKC people on that same list. I suspect that Officer Terry Yeakey might have been taken out by this team, as well as Dr. Don Chumley and Michael Loudenslager.
On a related topic, what do you make of Mr. Files Story?
I think it’s ridiculously not believable and that it doesn’t add up to how a professional intelligence organization operates
I know that if indeed we had some JFK shooter in jail, my choice as Operations officer would be secure a prison-fight/murder to shut him the fuck up, or better yet, introduce a toxin that kills but looks like a heart attack and that hasn’t happened so…
That was my thought as well. He seems like a Forrest Gump figure. His finger is in too many pies, so to speak. He knows too many of the players to have actually survived as long as he did.
when you read in The Devil’s Chessboard … so many moments of “WAIT BRUH REWIND” or “flips back page violently” in that book. Such as how Angleton and top deputies would go to Allen Dulles’ home and brief him—every one of them in violation of secrecy oaths doing that, all felonies—and many months after being fired by JFK.
When I saw that I was like “holy shit, so JFK fires these guys and they just pivot their meetings to Dulles’ house, he’s still told everything, and still directs the Agency”
Angleton and Dulles are my top 2. With Dulles the Executive who may have recruited some other executives into the plot (certain he brought LBJ on board when he visited LBJ’s ranch a week or so prior). Assuredly Dulles would’ve been aware of LBJ’s personality type, what makes him tick, what would be offensive to him and what would not. Assuredly as well Dulles would have ‘let slip’ or otherwise said something akin to “well we’re all just glad that Bobby Baker & Billie Estes thing didn’t bring you down. We’re counting on you.”
I strongly suspect that Oswald was initially part of one or two operations relative to analysis of Soviet capabilities, analysis of Soviet defection procedures—they wanted to find out what it was the Soviets would’ve asked defectors, wanted to also find out what they might know or ask re U-2, and importantly what they DO NOT ask. After he does that, I think he fulfilled his role for CIA. He wrote a report for them on the radio factor, was debriefed by Andy Anderson in Domestic Contacts division, had the whole thing paid for by the U.S. gov via cut-outs and Red Cross, may even have been taught some tradecraft.
I believe the plot’s skeleton and operational outline began in 1962, and that it was assuredly suggested in 1961 this be the next move when Dulles was fired. Then during that period you’ve got William K. Harvey and the Miami JM/WAVE station basically establishing their assassination cadres and methods, planning everything assuredly took more than a year, and I think Angleton is best candidate for selecting the patsy, from his files—a person who ticks all the right boxes—and that picked two names for two differing locations: Thomas Arthur Vallee if Chicago, Lee Harvey Oswald if Dallas, and for a short time, Lee Harvey Oswald if Washington, D.C. which was indeed a plot and for a short period of time Oswald is saying/writing he’ll be in D.C.
They probably had 3-4 different cities as targets, inserted assets in all of them. The PD assuredly had CIA assets embedded in it: Captain Westbrook and Roscoe White in Dallas. Then when they did RFK, Hank Hernandez and Manny Pena heading up the investigation for LAPD.
It’s Agency assets all the way down
It's insane that after all this time, they still act like Oswald did it.
BTW Kit, heard you on grayzone and it was hard to make out the audio.... Can you please get a simple mic to use? You don't need anything fancy but whatever you're using is really poor quality. It sounds like dial up quality audio of the 90s. 😂
The *only* people nowadays who maintain Oswald killed JFK are the CIA and its subsidiaries. If the Chinese or Russians or New Zealanders ever want to know if someone is CIA, I suggest they innocently raise the topic in casual conversation as to who killed JFK.
100% on target. The more they deny, the clearer the evidence becomes.
Great piece Kit. And of course Angleton was greatly honoured and celebrated in Israel after his death.
Thanks Kit. Especially loved reading the links. Great stuff.
My pleasure, Richard! Delighted you’re checking the receipts.
hell yes he was
okay NOW i’ll read it
And of course Angleton is either buried in this Israel or he has a memorial stone in his name there. Either way there are enough Israeli fanatics around, enough to make a difference if they just happened to be placed in the right position. Recall our own psychotic Orde Wingate who was in Palestine before he was dispatched to Burma?