Right, Don't forget that the main ideologist of German Nazi - Alfred Rosenberg - was greatly inspired by the "ideas" of Houston Stewart Chamberlain, British "philosopher" and founder of "scientific racism"
British empire killed 165 million Indians in 40 years: How Colonialism inspired Fascism:
Nice epilogue about Starmer there, Kit. I'd say it starts when he was at Leeds Uni... He (and his bio) certainly fits the profile to a T. So perhaps, what we have really been witnessing here with his manufactured rise to power is what's known in the business as a 'coup'...
I wonder why he was knighted by Charles instead of Elizabeth? Can easily see why she didn't want to hand over power for as long as possible, tbh. She actually had a social conscience, and supported Corbyn.
No doubt Charles sees himself as more of a 'realist'.
I’m not entirely sure Elizabeth had a social conscience. Just think of all the awful bills she signed off on, for example during Thatcher’s time, all of which effectively caused hurt, pain, and suffering to ‘her subjects’.
Then there’s the Saville stuff and various other forms of Establishment child abuse.
Besides, they don’t really have ‘power’ as such, seeing as they’re more like figureheads IMO. It’s all in the presentation, in the end.
Interesting question though about Starmer’s knighthood, for sure. I don’t really have an answer! Except it’s just one cunt knighting another cunt.
Actually it was well known that Elisabeth couldn't stand 'Maggie' one tiny little bit. She avoided meeting her whenever possible, and loathed her as much as she also loathed that maggot Murdoch. She was very proud of the NHS, and also the post-war Welfare State, and when Corbyn came along he instantly became her favourite - to the severe annoyance of the Establishment (And Palace). Corbyn himself was deeply charmed by her, and he sure as hell didn't expect to be, lollol.
AFAIK once again the 'Saville stuff' was pure Thatcher, - unsurprisingly. Even (old) Spitting Image ran a sketch where Thatcher was mentioned to be meeting Saville, and there was a strong indication this was for unsavoury reasons. Seems like the only people NOT informed about him were the kids sent to his shows, and the disabled kids in care homes. Needless to say, the elite-schooled ruling classes see nothing wrong with his behaviour - only that it should remain private.
They are quite powerless, albeit potentially with a lot of influence, if they are careful. Figureheads, yes.
Ironic that neither cunt has a cunt, although in this day and age, perhaps that doesn't matter as much. ;)
It needs to be noted and never forgotten that Margaret Thatcher covered up not only for her friend Jimmy Saville but for many paedophile abusers including a titled paedophile/sadist who was caught with a stash of literature of the most perverted, deviant paedophilia including torture of children on him when re-entering the U.K. Conservative M.P. Geoffrey Dickinson was bullied and vilified for his brave attempt to draw attention to an elite paedophile ring which included Tory M.P.s. The fact that Thatcher took part in the coverup says everything about her character. Theresa May deliberately kicked the can down the road by appointing various Heads of the Child Sex Abuse Inquiry she knew were unsuitable and compromised. May even managed to "accidentally" delete vital evidence sent to the Inquiry by abuse victims! Subsequent Prime Ministers both Tory and "New" Labour have frustratingly been no better.
You probably know more than I do about this perhaps. And perhaps I'm just an instinctive anti-monarch so I can't help myself having such reactions. It's the programming, obviously.
What I do know about this is that the Establishment/Deep State deliberately whipped up the public outrage when it all became public, and then directed that at their enemies. The very same techniques were used soon after the demonise Corbyn - globally.
I ALWAYS bear in mind that the very same press and media outlets who beat their chests so loudly over "pedos" are the very same people and outlets who knowingly covered for Saville's crimes for DECADES.
Saville was the domestic equivalent of Epstein's honey trap.
The UK media/Establishment just LURVE to accuse their opponents of being 'pedos' since; and poor Rolf was acquitted on appeal of all charges except one - the 15yr old he slept with that the sap later married.
Funny how that infamous "Dossier" has always remained buried, isn't it?
Bit like Epstein's List.
As per usual, the Establishment accuse others of what they do themselves shamelessly, and needless to say they control the megaphones.
I personally don't think Elisabeth had anything to do with this, although most of the 'elite' men she knew would have been raped and buggered while in their school years. Allegedly it must 'build character' - the same character as that being displayed by the IDF, no doubt.
Another alarm bell was how Andy Pandy was treated - for sleeping with a 17yr old. He was clearly used - and intended to be used - as a scapegoat; and once again ALL the media jumped with one voice. He was a gullible twat, little sympathy for him, but every single one of those copywriters and editors knew damned well the truth of Epstain Island LONG before, and willingly covered it up.
I don't think we'll ever learn the truth of all this; any investigators who get too close will either be tarred themselves, or disappeared.
I never thought Rolf was guilty at all. Their tactics to cover the child abuse network during the so-called enquiry were to misdirect the public's attention onto minor celebrities (given how obsessed they know the public are with celebrities), and make dramas out of them. Didn't matter if they were innocent or guilty, it kept the people occupied. In the meantime, they set this guy 'Nick' up to talk about pedo parties, all of which rings true of course, with an inevitable discrediting at the end, thus discrediting anyone else who tells similar stories.
And absolutely, they are all perfectly aware of the Network and half of them are involved.
The CIA whistles and British Intelligence wags its tail. Why oh why are all these "activities' held in such secret enclaves? Geewhizzums! BECAUSE they are what WE accuse the Other a k a Evil Empires of doing, hiding, inventing, denying, since they don't have a concept of what TRUTH is!!! WE on the other hand are the complete opposite of this, we are open, have freedoms inculcated in all of OUR citizens, no exceptions! This is what makes the US, UK 'exceptional" eternal and benevolent. Hey but guess what...when we proceed through "last stage capitalism" the camouflage evaporates and the rest of the World, which at one time or another, has been VICTIMS of our benevolent altruism, are seeing the relentless DECLINE of the 1%, Ruling Class, the Despicable Desperates and their golden patina of superiority turned into the rotting flesh and bones that it was really made of. Enjoy the show, it's called The Revolution, and it's unstoppable!!! As evidenced by recent events this paradigm has taken hold: Capitalism is cannibalism, socialism is humanism.
I think the key is in the Five Eyes agreement where member countries can surveil nationals from the others and then share the info. That way they bypass national legislation to spy their own citizens.
The clue is in the name. "Crown Prosecution Service". To expect democratic oversight by of and for "the people" in a constitutional monarchy is absurd. All of these operatives loyalties are to the crown. Taking the knee is not just some quaint ritual. It is a symbolic action to signify total submission. When we seek those who are acting with impunity we need look no further than the anachronistic crime family that resides in buck house. Everything leads back to them and their Dutch counterparts.
This goes back at least to the early 1970s, when MI5 made sure to hamstring Labour, as Labour was feared to quit Northern Ireland. The so-called "Wilson Plot".
Lol, I recall that MI6 made a HUGE effort to get to that trove of documents before they were "liberated" with the risk of release. Having failed at that, the intel agencies then decided to have a domestic coup to ensure no-one would face justice.
The western intel agencies are the real govt, and they are as amoral as any bolsheviks or Islamo-fundies.
Agreed, but more accurately, "The western intel agencies are the real govt, and they are as amoral as any Bolsheviks, Islamo-fundies, neoliberal or neocon.", one has to remember, none of them have a conscience.
Thank you Kit for the extremely informative reportage. British intelligence is very, very messy; one just has to look at their handy work in Northern Ireland in the 70s, 80s and 90s. The whole design is for them to do what the heck they want without any meddling from government. As for Starmer, he just stinks of Mi5 asset, and still doing their bidding.
The perversion of Starmer's acts of treasonous harms to the British people, leaves no doubting he is fully an installed asset of the Central/International Banking Mafia and there sociopathic plans to make hell on earth for the foreseeable future.
I attended a Young Conservative Convention in Harrogate 1977 or 78, accompanying the only member of the Club that was interested in politics. I still have never again met so many obnoxious, self opinionated upstart little pratts as those that made up the movers and shakers of the then Young Conservatives.
Starmer the moment I became aware of him reminded me entirely of my 1977 conclusion that, had I instead gone to a Young Labour Convention/Conference I'd had come across a very similar group of obnoxious, self opinionated upstart little Pratts,
I think the public first began to realise the depths of the police state with the Miners' strike in the 80s. The illegality was even acknowledged by operatives at the time but, apparently, some perverse notion of patriotism justified it. I suspect that is the lame answer still offered up.
Take British Intelligence, quintuple the funding, and you get ... the CIA operations branch. Since the Church committee investigations in the 1970's no one has looked under the hood and truly seen what is going on under the cloak of secrecy. A lavishly funded black budget, laughable congressional oversight, and you get everyone's worst nightmare of a rouge organization. Remember, former president Truman repudiated his creation of the operations side of the CIA, that is, the president's private army. Remember torture and rendition under dark lord VP Cheney? Because president Obama made zero effort to root out the participants in that horror show, those elements of the CIA are burning like embers beneath the surface, ready to burst into flame when summoned by another dark lord.
The UK and American, so called, "Exceptionalism" is nothing more than the Nazi Nationalism with a different label.
Right, Don't forget that the main ideologist of German Nazi - Alfred Rosenberg - was greatly inspired by the "ideas" of Houston Stewart Chamberlain, British "philosopher" and founder of "scientific racism"
British empire killed 165 million Indians in 40 years: How Colonialism inspired Fascism:
youtube.com/watch?v=Ob_lIQRAnYM
youtube.com/watch?v=jgkUU946Iyw
When killing the indigenous people the "cultured" colonialists usually called them "savages".. The irony is thick..
youtube.com/shorts/h-6Bo4DupHg
Dehumanization has always been the basic prerequisite for colonization, slavery and genocide.
The Spanish "Conquistadors" treated the American Indians like animals, claiming they have no "soul". The same way slavers treated the black people.
And this is exactly how Colonialism inspired Fascism/Imperialism.
Similarly, the Western Europeans still consider the Slavs to be "Untermensch", tho they would never openly admit it.
How Britain and U.S. Inspired Nazi Eugenics:
youtube.com/watch?v=7Dyyt2kVOEg
And don't forget Brits had invented concentration camps long before German Nazis did (2nd Anglo-Boer War, 1899–1902)
BTW, after WW2 in Malaysia, Brits used concentration camps and "agent Orange", inspiring U.S. to adopt similar tactics against the Vietnamese..
youtu.be/kfqHMTBgOlM?t=635
The title alone merits a like. 👍
Nice epilogue about Starmer there, Kit. I'd say it starts when he was at Leeds Uni... He (and his bio) certainly fits the profile to a T. So perhaps, what we have really been witnessing here with his manufactured rise to power is what's known in the business as a 'coup'...
I wonder why he was knighted by Charles instead of Elizabeth? Can easily see why she didn't want to hand over power for as long as possible, tbh. She actually had a social conscience, and supported Corbyn.
No doubt Charles sees himself as more of a 'realist'.
I’m not entirely sure Elizabeth had a social conscience. Just think of all the awful bills she signed off on, for example during Thatcher’s time, all of which effectively caused hurt, pain, and suffering to ‘her subjects’.
Then there’s the Saville stuff and various other forms of Establishment child abuse.
Besides, they don’t really have ‘power’ as such, seeing as they’re more like figureheads IMO. It’s all in the presentation, in the end.
Interesting question though about Starmer’s knighthood, for sure. I don’t really have an answer! Except it’s just one cunt knighting another cunt.
Actually it was well known that Elisabeth couldn't stand 'Maggie' one tiny little bit. She avoided meeting her whenever possible, and loathed her as much as she also loathed that maggot Murdoch. She was very proud of the NHS, and also the post-war Welfare State, and when Corbyn came along he instantly became her favourite - to the severe annoyance of the Establishment (And Palace). Corbyn himself was deeply charmed by her, and he sure as hell didn't expect to be, lollol.
AFAIK once again the 'Saville stuff' was pure Thatcher, - unsurprisingly. Even (old) Spitting Image ran a sketch where Thatcher was mentioned to be meeting Saville, and there was a strong indication this was for unsavoury reasons. Seems like the only people NOT informed about him were the kids sent to his shows, and the disabled kids in care homes. Needless to say, the elite-schooled ruling classes see nothing wrong with his behaviour - only that it should remain private.
They are quite powerless, albeit potentially with a lot of influence, if they are careful. Figureheads, yes.
Ironic that neither cunt has a cunt, although in this day and age, perhaps that doesn't matter as much. ;)
It needs to be noted and never forgotten that Margaret Thatcher covered up not only for her friend Jimmy Saville but for many paedophile abusers including a titled paedophile/sadist who was caught with a stash of literature of the most perverted, deviant paedophilia including torture of children on him when re-entering the U.K. Conservative M.P. Geoffrey Dickinson was bullied and vilified for his brave attempt to draw attention to an elite paedophile ring which included Tory M.P.s. The fact that Thatcher took part in the coverup says everything about her character. Theresa May deliberately kicked the can down the road by appointing various Heads of the Child Sex Abuse Inquiry she knew were unsuitable and compromised. May even managed to "accidentally" delete vital evidence sent to the Inquiry by abuse victims! Subsequent Prime Ministers both Tory and "New" Labour have frustratingly been no better.
You probably know more than I do about this perhaps. And perhaps I'm just an instinctive anti-monarch so I can't help myself having such reactions. It's the programming, obviously.
What I do know about this is that the Establishment/Deep State deliberately whipped up the public outrage when it all became public, and then directed that at their enemies. The very same techniques were used soon after the demonise Corbyn - globally.
I ALWAYS bear in mind that the very same press and media outlets who beat their chests so loudly over "pedos" are the very same people and outlets who knowingly covered for Saville's crimes for DECADES.
Saville was the domestic equivalent of Epstein's honey trap.
The UK media/Establishment just LURVE to accuse their opponents of being 'pedos' since; and poor Rolf was acquitted on appeal of all charges except one - the 15yr old he slept with that the sap later married.
Funny how that infamous "Dossier" has always remained buried, isn't it?
Bit like Epstein's List.
As per usual, the Establishment accuse others of what they do themselves shamelessly, and needless to say they control the megaphones.
I personally don't think Elisabeth had anything to do with this, although most of the 'elite' men she knew would have been raped and buggered while in their school years. Allegedly it must 'build character' - the same character as that being displayed by the IDF, no doubt.
Another alarm bell was how Andy Pandy was treated - for sleeping with a 17yr old. He was clearly used - and intended to be used - as a scapegoat; and once again ALL the media jumped with one voice. He was a gullible twat, little sympathy for him, but every single one of those copywriters and editors knew damned well the truth of Epstain Island LONG before, and willingly covered it up.
I don't think we'll ever learn the truth of all this; any investigators who get too close will either be tarred themselves, or disappeared.
They seem to be outraged that Russel Brand managed to dig his way out of this trap.
I never thought Rolf was guilty at all. Their tactics to cover the child abuse network during the so-called enquiry were to misdirect the public's attention onto minor celebrities (given how obsessed they know the public are with celebrities), and make dramas out of them. Didn't matter if they were innocent or guilty, it kept the people occupied. In the meantime, they set this guy 'Nick' up to talk about pedo parties, all of which rings true of course, with an inevitable discrediting at the end, thus discrediting anyone else who tells similar stories.
And absolutely, they are all perfectly aware of the Network and half of them are involved.
Such is the character of homo immanis.
All the roads lead to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange.
The CIA whistles and British Intelligence wags its tail. Why oh why are all these "activities' held in such secret enclaves? Geewhizzums! BECAUSE they are what WE accuse the Other a k a Evil Empires of doing, hiding, inventing, denying, since they don't have a concept of what TRUTH is!!! WE on the other hand are the complete opposite of this, we are open, have freedoms inculcated in all of OUR citizens, no exceptions! This is what makes the US, UK 'exceptional" eternal and benevolent. Hey but guess what...when we proceed through "last stage capitalism" the camouflage evaporates and the rest of the World, which at one time or another, has been VICTIMS of our benevolent altruism, are seeing the relentless DECLINE of the 1%, Ruling Class, the Despicable Desperates and their golden patina of superiority turned into the rotting flesh and bones that it was really made of. Enjoy the show, it's called The Revolution, and it's unstoppable!!! As evidenced by recent events this paradigm has taken hold: Capitalism is cannibalism, socialism is humanism.
The British hand out “Knighthoods” as if they were dispensing gumballs from a machine.
I think the key is in the Five Eyes agreement where member countries can surveil nationals from the others and then share the info. That way they bypass national legislation to spy their own citizens.
Great job Kit. So much muck to clear out.
The clue is in the name. "Crown Prosecution Service". To expect democratic oversight by of and for "the people" in a constitutional monarchy is absurd. All of these operatives loyalties are to the crown. Taking the knee is not just some quaint ritual. It is a symbolic action to signify total submission. When we seek those who are acting with impunity we need look no further than the anachronistic crime family that resides in buck house. Everything leads back to them and their Dutch counterparts.
This goes back at least to the early 1970s, when MI5 made sure to hamstring Labour, as Labour was feared to quit Northern Ireland. The so-called "Wilson Plot".
Lol, I recall that MI6 made a HUGE effort to get to that trove of documents before they were "liberated" with the risk of release. Having failed at that, the intel agencies then decided to have a domestic coup to ensure no-one would face justice.
The western intel agencies are the real govt, and they are as amoral as any bolsheviks or Islamo-fundies.
Agreed, but more accurately, "The western intel agencies are the real govt, and they are as amoral as any Bolsheviks, Islamo-fundies, neoliberal or neocon.", one has to remember, none of them have a conscience.
Truth accepted.
And add to that list Zionazi as well.
Thank you for a very good article, Kit Klarenberg! Now also in the difficult Norwegian language: https://steigan.no/2025/05/britisk-etterretning-en-lov-i-kraft-av-seg-selv/
I remain ever-humbled and flattered that you translate my work for me, my friend!
Thank you, my friend! It’s a thrill! I wish I could do this full-time! Have a productive day (or a well-earned day off!)
Thank you Kit for the extremely informative reportage. British intelligence is very, very messy; one just has to look at their handy work in Northern Ireland in the 70s, 80s and 90s. The whole design is for them to do what the heck they want without any meddling from government. As for Starmer, he just stinks of Mi5 asset, and still doing their bidding.
The perversion of Starmer's acts of treasonous harms to the British people, leaves no doubting he is fully an installed asset of the Central/International Banking Mafia and there sociopathic plans to make hell on earth for the foreseeable future.
I attended a Young Conservative Convention in Harrogate 1977 or 78, accompanying the only member of the Club that was interested in politics. I still have never again met so many obnoxious, self opinionated upstart little pratts as those that made up the movers and shakers of the then Young Conservatives.
Starmer the moment I became aware of him reminded me entirely of my 1977 conclusion that, had I instead gone to a Young Labour Convention/Conference I'd had come across a very similar group of obnoxious, self opinionated upstart little Pratts,
As Krautsky said, 'The Capitalist class does not govern, but it rules.'
I think the public first began to realise the depths of the police state with the Miners' strike in the 80s. The illegality was even acknowledged by operatives at the time but, apparently, some perverse notion of patriotism justified it. I suspect that is the lame answer still offered up.
Take British Intelligence, quintuple the funding, and you get ... the CIA operations branch. Since the Church committee investigations in the 1970's no one has looked under the hood and truly seen what is going on under the cloak of secrecy. A lavishly funded black budget, laughable congressional oversight, and you get everyone's worst nightmare of a rouge organization. Remember, former president Truman repudiated his creation of the operations side of the CIA, that is, the president's private army. Remember torture and rendition under dark lord VP Cheney? Because president Obama made zero effort to root out the participants in that horror show, those elements of the CIA are burning like embers beneath the surface, ready to burst into flame when summoned by another dark lord.