Many thanks for alerting me to this story, and particularly to Crispin's excellent diary of the trial. I was already writing about two other provocations carried out by Kiev/MI6, which appeared acutely timed for the G7 event - the strike on the Dormition cathedral in Kiev and Z's 'response' in drone strikes on Moscow:
But before I finished writing, I came across the story of the Admiral Grigorivich and the Yacht/marine drone threat, which explained heaps - the UK launched a pirate attack on a Russian tanker on Sunday 14th, and the stunt with the Russian frigate on Tuesday 16th, while in between came the Old Bailey verdict - all helping to hype up the Russian threat and NATO's military campaign. Even Australia contributed another $100 million to Kiev off the back of it.
ALl these things go together, so coincidences over the Russian ships reinforce the idea that the Arson attack scheme was an MI5 operation, just like Salisbury.
That the BBC asked Ben Wallace for his opinion brought it all together, not to mention Panorama itself. Extraordinary! And horribly effective.
Surely the BBC are guilty of withholding evidence in a case of terrorism carried out by Russia, if what they've said is true and the police say they have no such evidence? Isnt that a crime? Are we expected to believe that the police would have no interest in such information?
Does Starmer, or those affected by the arse-on, get any compensation for being victims of a crime? That could possibly change 'El Money' to 'Alimony'.
Unless it's something to do with Elm and Honey. Or L. Money. Or Munny. Or Minnie the Moocher. Or the Little Red Rooster. Or Ronnie and Reggie Kray. Or the infamous Piranha Brothers.
The mind truly boggles. Time to change one's goggles.
Whatever the truth may - or may not - be, it's definitely a bit of skulduggery. They should've done a robbery along with the arse-on, and that would've completed the Panama hat trick. On paper, at least.
[Oh, and I love the way the automatic spellcheck still doesn't recognise the word 'Starmer' as a legitimate word. It keeps putting a red line under it. That's got to be some spook having a laugh. I thoroughly approve.]
Telegram would have given the authorities the account name, phone number, IP address, internet provider etc. If it was Russian they would be shouting it from the rooftops all day every day.
One of the few growth areas left in Ukraine are call-centres, many in Dnipro and owned by extreme nationalists which mostly target Russia. When British intelligence wants you to believe something, the exact opposite is often true. El Money is big business.
Every part of this freak show screams 'cover-up', or more currently, 'Fed-slop'. Skripal again. How can democracy function when collusion at this level exists? It doesn't. It pretends. This show trial was as Karl Rove infamously said : "“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” They make stuff up. The Judge and BBCNN stamp it as real.
Imagine if this had been Corbyn, the speed of the 'investigation' would have set Scotland Yard on fire!
Not a fast as his apology though.
Many thanks for alerting me to this story, and particularly to Crispin's excellent diary of the trial. I was already writing about two other provocations carried out by Kiev/MI6, which appeared acutely timed for the G7 event - the strike on the Dormition cathedral in Kiev and Z's 'response' in drone strikes on Moscow:
https://1489.is/kievs-double-act/
But before I finished writing, I came across the story of the Admiral Grigorivich and the Yacht/marine drone threat, which explained heaps - the UK launched a pirate attack on a Russian tanker on Sunday 14th, and the stunt with the Russian frigate on Tuesday 16th, while in between came the Old Bailey verdict - all helping to hype up the Russian threat and NATO's military campaign. Even Australia contributed another $100 million to Kiev off the back of it.
ALl these things go together, so coincidences over the Russian ships reinforce the idea that the Arson attack scheme was an MI5 operation, just like Salisbury.
That the BBC asked Ben Wallace for his opinion brought it all together, not to mention Panorama itself. Extraordinary! And horribly effective.
Surely the BBC are guilty of withholding evidence in a case of terrorism carried out by Russia, if what they've said is true and the police say they have no such evidence? Isnt that a crime? Are we expected to believe that the police would have no interest in such information?
Does Starmer, or those affected by the arse-on, get any compensation for being victims of a crime? That could possibly change 'El Money' to 'Alimony'.
Unless it's something to do with Elm and Honey. Or L. Money. Or Munny. Or Minnie the Moocher. Or the Little Red Rooster. Or Ronnie and Reggie Kray. Or the infamous Piranha Brothers.
The mind truly boggles. Time to change one's goggles.
Whatever the truth may - or may not - be, it's definitely a bit of skulduggery. They should've done a robbery along with the arse-on, and that would've completed the Panama hat trick. On paper, at least.
[Oh, and I love the way the automatic spellcheck still doesn't recognise the word 'Starmer' as a legitimate word. It keeps putting a red line under it. That's got to be some spook having a laugh. I thoroughly approve.]
Best comment of the day.
🤣🤣🤣
Telegram would have given the authorities the account name, phone number, IP address, internet provider etc. If it was Russian they would be shouting it from the rooftops all day every day.
Government, thy name is coverup. That goes for all forms of government, but especially western forms of governments.
"Russia gate" obsession of Britain
The british political class has no priority other than the War On Russia.
This inquiry could go on for years . Has a Skirpal event similarly which was a M16 operation .
You’d have to be simple minded to trust BBC News to be curious .
One of the few growth areas left in Ukraine are call-centres, many in Dnipro and owned by extreme nationalists which mostly target Russia. When British intelligence wants you to believe something, the exact opposite is often true. El Money is big business.
Naive question: Just when can we have TRUTHFUL moral people in the Justice systems/Parliaments and news?
Just getting truly fed up.
Thanks so much for your work Ken.
The answer is there - arse on.
Once upon a time, not so long ago, any development that the establishment of the day didn't like could automatically be blamed on Jews.
Crops failed? Because Jews.
Freak storm sank the royal fleet? Everyone knows that Jews not only hate us because we are so noble and kind, Jews also can control the weather.
Foreign invasion? Machinations of Jews.
King's eldest son and heir turns out to be a rather flamboyant and barely closeted homosexual? Jews, you silly goose!
No evidence needed. Because Jews. What, are you on their side?
Today's establishment is far more enlightened. They do not blame unwanted election results and social dissension on Jews. Instead, they blame Russia.
Every part of this freak show screams 'cover-up', or more currently, 'Fed-slop'. Skripal again. How can democracy function when collusion at this level exists? It doesn't. It pretends. This show trial was as Karl Rove infamously said : "“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” They make stuff up. The Judge and BBCNN stamp it as real.
A multi-agency coverup in play.
They look like nice boys.
There's a lot of arsing about!
Somehow it reminds me of "Iranian" arson of discarded Jewish ambulances.