Surely the BBC are guilty of withholding evidence in a case of terrorism carried out by Russia, if what they've said is true and the police say they have no such evidence? Isnt that a crime? Are we expected to believe that the police would have no interest in such information?
Many thanks for alerting me to this story, and particularly to Crispin's excellent diary of the trial. I was already writing about two other provocations carried out by Kiev/MI6, which appeared acutely timed for the G7 event - the strike on the Dormition cathedral in Kiev and Z's 'response' in drone strikes on Moscow:
But before I finished writing, I came across the story of the Admiral Grigorivich and the Yacht/marine drone threat, which explained heaps - the UK launched a pirate attack on a Russian tanker on Sunday 14th, and the stunt with the Russian frigate on Tuesday 16th, while in between came the Old Bailey verdict - all helping to hype up the Russian threat and NATO's military campaign. Even Australia contributed another $100 million to Kiev off the back of it.
ALl these things go together, so coincidences over the Russian ships reinforce the idea that the Arson attack scheme was an MI5 operation, just like Salisbury.
That the BBC asked Ben Wallace for his opinion brought it all together, not to mention Panorama itself. Extraordinary! And horribly effective.
Imagine if this had been Corbyn, the speed of the 'investigation' would have set Scotland Yard on fire!
Surely the BBC are guilty of withholding evidence in a case of terrorism carried out by Russia, if what they've said is true and the police say they have no such evidence? Isnt that a crime? Are we expected to believe that the police would have no interest in such information?
Government, thy name is coverup. That goes for all forms of government, but especially western forms of governments.
Many thanks for alerting me to this story, and particularly to Crispin's excellent diary of the trial. I was already writing about two other provocations carried out by Kiev/MI6, which appeared acutely timed for the G7 event - the strike on the Dormition cathedral in Kiev and Z's 'response' in drone strikes on Moscow:
https://1489.is/kievs-double-act/
But before I finished writing, I came across the story of the Admiral Grigorivich and the Yacht/marine drone threat, which explained heaps - the UK launched a pirate attack on a Russian tanker on Sunday 14th, and the stunt with the Russian frigate on Tuesday 16th, while in between came the Old Bailey verdict - all helping to hype up the Russian threat and NATO's military campaign. Even Australia contributed another $100 million to Kiev off the back of it.
ALl these things go together, so coincidences over the Russian ships reinforce the idea that the Arson attack scheme was an MI5 operation, just like Salisbury.
That the BBC asked Ben Wallace for his opinion brought it all together, not to mention Panorama itself. Extraordinary! And horribly effective.
They look like nice boys.
"Russia gate" obsession of Britain
Naive question: Just when can we have TRUTHFUL moral people in the Justice systems/Parliaments and news?
Just getting truly fed up.
Thanks so much for your work Ken.
The answer is there - arse on.
This inquiry could go on for years . Has a Skirpal event similarly which was a M16 operation .
You’d have to be simple minded to trust BBC News to be curious .
Great piece. I think this is key:
“There were obvious questions from the start. How did these men know details about Starmer’s former car and two addresses connected to him?”
I do recall an early rumour put about that Starmer knew Roman Lavrynovych from playing cards?
But can’t find any source for that. 🤔