Editor’s Note: This investigation was previously published by MintPress News, a crusading independent media outlet well worth your time, and consideration.
Indeed, plantong bombs on Iraq synagogues to create fear in Arab-Jews and persuade them to move to the newly established state of Terror known as Israel. See interview of historian Avi Shliam on The Thinking Muslim and also his book, Three Worlds.
What I read about such was that the Zionist Jews abandoned their Brethren from the Ghettos of the EU and then of course, Hitler obliged them, and what was his bitch about Jews? The Zionists wanted only the creme of their crop. While these Zionist/Ashkenazi Jews had no semitic DNA blood and why Netanyahu in his ugly genociding campaign, will not allow blood testing for DNA that would actually prove he and his cabinet are the most anti-Semitic people in the world waging war/genocide on people with the DNA that says they are the people of their land going way back before the imperialist and colonialist Zionists got to land that did not belong to them. They lived before the Balfour Agreement, among a culture of tolerance of the many. See Avi Shlaim's book, Three Worlds. He and his family lived the very and privileged life they had in Iraq prior to the Zionists taking of Palestinian lands. It changed their lives from better to worse when the Mossad bomb their synagogues in false flag operations and their Arab neighbors felt like jews could no longer be trusted. Read his book; last chapter is exceptional.
Read 1666 Redemption Through Sin (even the blurb on Amazon provides a lot of information), it explains that what we think of as a "Jew" is not universal, they are not homogenous, many practice Satanism. In my Substack I have links to Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld's book accusing the Zionists of Nazi war crimes. I've put screenshots of different books, including 51 Documents and I think also Avi Shlaim's book, and a link to an interview with him. I became interested in the subject of genocides when researching who and why was behind Covid. Two books came out last week, The Pfizer Papers by Naomi Wolf, that details the most tragic deliberate assault in the recorded history of this world. Also a book called Transhuman by Dr Ana M____ she gives photos of the nano technology etc inside the Covid shots. Both books can be given to lawyers. How this relates to Zionism is their incessant hatred, their eugenics/white supremacist believes and the CEO of Pfizer was honored by Israel (he's a dual national I am told).
Thank you, Kit, for this research. It is amazing how in this era of widely available information people forget and even deny history on a regular basis. Seems that the more information there is on the internet, the less people remember or retain it and they are more likely to believe the recent distortions and lies about the past.
"How does it feel, in the light of all that's going on, to be the father of terrorism in the Middle East?" "In the Middle East?" he [Begin] bellowed, in his thick, cartoon accent. "In all the world!" - Russell Warren Howe interview with Menachem Begin, January 1974
In other words, Zionist terrorism is feared and submitted to, because it is white and extremely murderous, with modern WMD, modern torture technics and nukes. It is forbidden to call Zionist terrorism "terrorism".
In the 80's, Zionists switched the narrative and started using the term "terrorism" in mirror propaganda against their targets.
Today, the term "terrorism" means the struggle of the oppressed people for liberation. And terrorism on the industrial, highly automatized and computerized scale is called "war".
This here is a forgotten Mondoweiss article:
"The June 24-27, 1984 conference was organized by the Jonathan Institute, named after Benjamin Netanyahu’s older brother, a member of the Israeli Special Forces killed in 1976 during the famous raid at Entebbe.
The participants represented a veritable who’s who of Israeli and American politicians, academics and commentators, making the conference (later published into an extremely successful book by Netanyahu) a landmark event in the history of the Israeli and American discourses on “terrorism.”
The purpose of the Institute, through such conferences (the first took place in Jerusalem in 1979), was to convince the governments of the “free world” that the “battle against terrorism” Israel had been waging for years was in fact “part of a much larger struggle, one between the forces of civilization and the forces of barbarism.”
“Terrorism” was said to be intimately linked to “totalitarianism” as well as to Islam. Moscow, along with the PLO and its Arab allies, were repeatedly described as the central actors in a veritable “international terrorist network.”
Terrorism started with Zionist gangs in Palestine, this exact word.
This is how they called themselves and were called by the British.
Here is Yitzhak Shamir, a former Israeli Prime Minister, a member of the Jewish pre-state militia Lehi (Stern Gang), designated by the British as a "terrorist gang," and the reputed assassin of Count Bernadotte, the UN representative in the Middle East.
"Neither Jewish ethics nor Jewish tradition can disqualify terrorism as a means of combat.
"We are very far from having any moral qualms as far as our national war goes. We have before us the command of the Torah, whose morality surpasses that of any other body of laws in the world: 'Ye shall blot them out to the last man.' We are particularly far from having any qualms with regard to the enemy, whose moral degradation is universally admitted here.
"But first and foremost, terrorism is for us a part of the political battle being conducted under the present circumstances, and it has a great part to play: Speaking in a clear voice to the whole world, as well as to our wretched brethren outside this land, it proclaims our war against the occupier. The real terrorist hides behind his stacks of papers and of laws he himself legislated. [Our terrorism] is not aimed at persons [Lehi & the Irgun, another Jewish terrorist group headed by another future PM, Menachem Begin, killed 232 men, women and children and wounded another 370 from the end of 1937 until the middle of 1939], but rather at representatives, and therefore it is effective. If, in addition, it shakes the Jewish population out of its complacency, so much the better. Thus, and only thus, will the battle for liberation commence."
Published in the Lehi paper HeHazit (The Front), 1943
Israel learned from the best teacher, Britain. I believe Menachem Begin credited Britain for all of his tactics which we still see today when the IDF uses Arab prisoners as human shields. Orde Wingate did that exact same thing in 1936.
As Gogs points out, Israel's obsession with 'terrorism' is pure projection- the state of Israel was born of the most systematic terrorist campaign in modern history. Its victims including Count Bernadotte of the UN and Lord Moyne.
Its tactics were founded on the training settler colonists received from the likes of Orde Wingate seconded to Palestine from the Higher Institutes in native popular repression found in India and elsewhere across the empire
And never mind that Zionist terrorism was already a devastating reality in the years leading up to the Nakba. Begin, Shamir among the leading terrorist thugs. The Zionists are masters in terrorism! Britain lost many who were based in Palestine during the mandate to those bastards, and today stupid old Blighty supports, essentially, the same terrorists.
Max Blumenthal's 'The Management of Savagery' is a great book, recounting US complicity with the 9/11 hijackers. Like your piece here, though, he doesn't engage with the physics of the 9/11 attacks. It's good to see some, like Piers Robinson, gradually calling out this era-defining abomination for what it was - a false flag. If you haven't already, Kit, it would be good to see you report - or interview - some of those highly qualified researchers who've concluded that the official account is not credible. https://www.ae911truth.org
It's difficult, isn't it. I've weighed this for a long time and come to the conclusion that we have to be able to have honest conversations about it without fear of being branded conspiracy theorists. There's too much at stake. If the official conspiracy theory is wrong - and I think it irrefutably is - then the way we narrate current history has to be reshaped. As things stand, contemporary history is framed by "terrorism" conducted by "rabid Islamists". Accepting that is to cede territory of legitimation.
I think I would actually agree with you there - especially about rejecting the fear of being labelled with a term intentionally loaded with negative connotations. I actually enthusiastically embrace the term 'conspiracy theorist' and essentially take back ownership of it. For me, though, as I'm not a prominent journalist one bad move away from the real terrorists bursting into my house at 4 in the morning, it's a little easier.
But it is true that we should all be hammering home certain truths and messages and attempting to wake as many people up as possible. On the other paw, I am fairly certain Kit is aware that the vast majority of his readership already know all these truths. So I think maybe it's about 'delegating roles' or something. I'm sure Kit also knows that many of his readers with less to lose will take care of the education of the people with regards to the basic concept of a false flag and the fact that buildings don't collapse like that without assistance. Laws of physics etc. That way, he can concentrate on these wonderful history explainer articles. Because these articles are essentially 'the big picture' which form the backdrop to all these false flags and hypocritical use of the word 'terrorism' by the real terrorists themselves (psychological projection etc.).
He can be quite clever about it though - notice how in this article he put the word 'blowback' in parentheses, and also linked to a 911 blogger article. Doing it that way means he retains that old chestnut known as 'plausible deniability'.
Actually I dont think that is what Kit is doing. I suspect he is referencing a seminal article about this, that was published several decades ago in the UK newspaper the Independent:
"America's spies paid and trained their nation's worst enemies, reveals Andrew Marshall in Washington"
The point of the referenced article is that the US policy of sponsoring islamic-motivated guerrilla forces in Afghanistan, later on resulted in those very forces turning on the US in reaction to what they saw as the defilement of their holy land with US-bases (in effect US military occupation).
Further more "9/11" was not actually the start of the blowback. These forces, dubbed Al Qaida" by the US, had already in the early 1990s bombed US embassies in Kenya and Sudan, along with the USS Cole off Yemen. And "9/'11" was not the first bombing of the World Trade Center in New York. The same forces were linked to a previous attempt in 1993 in which a truck filled with explosives was set off in the parking garage of the building, placed near support structures where where apparently it was possible to bring the entire building down.
Unfortunately aready back in 2001 we lived in a media landscape devoid of any kind of grasp on history or ability to maintain and connect the dots, so 99.9% of the public were not even aware back then that "9/11" wasnt actually the first attack on the WTC attributed to the same group. And today the social media and mainstream media landscape is even MORE devoid of historical knowledge and insight. Its just one giant ball of momentary noise, with little or no perspective over time.
Anyway all these attacks on US buildings and military assets, by a group formerly known to be on the CIA payroll (via the Pakistani ISS and the Saudi security services) is what was and is considered to be "blockback".
Has it not long been written that "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?
The career of the Taliban is most instructive. When they were useful against the Soviets, the people who went on to form the Taliban were invited to the White House and none other than Ronald Regan lauded his guests as "the moral equivalent of the Founding Fathers". Once their usefulness ended, the Taliban were consigned to being retrograde oppressors of Muh Afghan Women and Girls.
For that matter, we may recall the South African and Rhodesian governments labeling anyone that they didn't like a "terrorist". This landed none other than Nelson Mandela on the UK terrorism watchlist - until 2003.
I feel honored that a journalist like Kit liked my post. Yes, I've purchased and read his books. A true hero for the Truth and please don't let it get you down that few seem to. view your recent podcast. Always hang in there for the truth. And while you may not agree with Tommy Robinson's documentary, it is real experience how different voices are shut down in the UK and I see it coming to the USA. No fear, no gain, no pain no gain. It is very sad majority of people don't know what we know. The entire world will be harmed greatly by ignorance and censorship.
This all sounds eerily reminiscent of the dirty tricks Britain's ruling class spent over a century perfecting in their first modern colony of their developed imperialist epoch - Ireland. Especially in the 1960s-90s with how 'The Troubles' played out in their media. Aside from the actual national liberation struggle taking place on the ground, there were always four or five fictional versions of it being sensationalized, promoted, and mystified in mass media. The atmosphere surrounding something otherwise relatively straightforward and understandable became so nonsensical that any average outsider passively consuming British/European media would be the least informed on the subject. Instead of asking uncomfortably awkward questions about foreign military occupation and imperialism, they'd convince people their own eyes and ears were wrong and fill their heads with a bunch of psychobabble about 'sectarianism' or 'extremism' or 'terrorism' - reasons for which must have begun so long ago, for reasons long since forgotten so don't worry about who's doing what to whom - instead of the truth staring you right in the face. They really did figure out the most effective use of public misdirection.
I believe that monster who created Bibi was quoted here in 1991. But this doctrine was actually developed in the years leading up to the Zionist State. They clearly feel that terror is justified and they have rightful monopoly to this.
Indeed, plantong bombs on Iraq synagogues to create fear in Arab-Jews and persuade them to move to the newly established state of Terror known as Israel. See interview of historian Avi Shliam on The Thinking Muslim and also his book, Three Worlds.
You might be interested in my (free) post that is a select bibliography that almost accuses the Zionists of murdering the Jews WWII, I leave the thinking to the reader. https://shonaduncan.substack.com/p/zionism-vs-judaism-the-holocaust
What I read about such was that the Zionist Jews abandoned their Brethren from the Ghettos of the EU and then of course, Hitler obliged them, and what was his bitch about Jews? The Zionists wanted only the creme of their crop. While these Zionist/Ashkenazi Jews had no semitic DNA blood and why Netanyahu in his ugly genociding campaign, will not allow blood testing for DNA that would actually prove he and his cabinet are the most anti-Semitic people in the world waging war/genocide on people with the DNA that says they are the people of their land going way back before the imperialist and colonialist Zionists got to land that did not belong to them. They lived before the Balfour Agreement, among a culture of tolerance of the many. See Avi Shlaim's book, Three Worlds. He and his family lived the very and privileged life they had in Iraq prior to the Zionists taking of Palestinian lands. It changed their lives from better to worse when the Mossad bomb their synagogues in false flag operations and their Arab neighbors felt like jews could no longer be trusted. Read his book; last chapter is exceptional.
Read 1666 Redemption Through Sin (even the blurb on Amazon provides a lot of information), it explains that what we think of as a "Jew" is not universal, they are not homogenous, many practice Satanism. In my Substack I have links to Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld's book accusing the Zionists of Nazi war crimes. I've put screenshots of different books, including 51 Documents and I think also Avi Shlaim's book, and a link to an interview with him. I became interested in the subject of genocides when researching who and why was behind Covid. Two books came out last week, The Pfizer Papers by Naomi Wolf, that details the most tragic deliberate assault in the recorded history of this world. Also a book called Transhuman by Dr Ana M____ she gives photos of the nano technology etc inside the Covid shots. Both books can be given to lawyers. How this relates to Zionism is their incessant hatred, their eugenics/white supremacist believes and the CEO of Pfizer was honored by Israel (he's a dual national I am told).
Brilliant breakdown
Thank you, Kit, for this research. It is amazing how in this era of widely available information people forget and even deny history on a regular basis. Seems that the more information there is on the internet, the less people remember or retain it and they are more likely to believe the recent distortions and lies about the past.
"How does it feel, in the light of all that's going on, to be the father of terrorism in the Middle East?" "In the Middle East?" he [Begin] bellowed, in his thick, cartoon accent. "In all the world!" - Russell Warren Howe interview with Menachem Begin, January 1974
In other words, Zionist terrorism is feared and submitted to, because it is white and extremely murderous, with modern WMD, modern torture technics and nukes. It is forbidden to call Zionist terrorism "terrorism".
In the 80's, Zionists switched the narrative and started using the term "terrorism" in mirror propaganda against their targets.
Today, the term "terrorism" means the struggle of the oppressed people for liberation. And terrorism on the industrial, highly automatized and computerized scale is called "war".
This here is a forgotten Mondoweiss article:
"The June 24-27, 1984 conference was organized by the Jonathan Institute, named after Benjamin Netanyahu’s older brother, a member of the Israeli Special Forces killed in 1976 during the famous raid at Entebbe.
The participants represented a veritable who’s who of Israeli and American politicians, academics and commentators, making the conference (later published into an extremely successful book by Netanyahu) a landmark event in the history of the Israeli and American discourses on “terrorism.”
The purpose of the Institute, through such conferences (the first took place in Jerusalem in 1979), was to convince the governments of the “free world” that the “battle against terrorism” Israel had been waging for years was in fact “part of a much larger struggle, one between the forces of civilization and the forces of barbarism.”
“Terrorism” was said to be intimately linked to “totalitarianism” as well as to Islam. Moscow, along with the PLO and its Arab allies, were repeatedly described as the central actors in a veritable “international terrorist network.”
https://mondoweiss.net/2014/08/israels-terrorism-ideological/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR17rxgsmAglGS2WlQK8edg5A4gHzKjFurXQqNfW0IIob9t5GrjBuDdji_0_aem_2Loi-rTQaYNgLPfL12L6Ow
Terrorism started with Zionist gangs in Palestine, this exact word.
This is how they called themselves and were called by the British.
Here is Yitzhak Shamir, a former Israeli Prime Minister, a member of the Jewish pre-state militia Lehi (Stern Gang), designated by the British as a "terrorist gang," and the reputed assassin of Count Bernadotte, the UN representative in the Middle East.
"Neither Jewish ethics nor Jewish tradition can disqualify terrorism as a means of combat.
"We are very far from having any moral qualms as far as our national war goes. We have before us the command of the Torah, whose morality surpasses that of any other body of laws in the world: 'Ye shall blot them out to the last man.' We are particularly far from having any qualms with regard to the enemy, whose moral degradation is universally admitted here.
"But first and foremost, terrorism is for us a part of the political battle being conducted under the present circumstances, and it has a great part to play: Speaking in a clear voice to the whole world, as well as to our wretched brethren outside this land, it proclaims our war against the occupier. The real terrorist hides behind his stacks of papers and of laws he himself legislated. [Our terrorism] is not aimed at persons [Lehi & the Irgun, another Jewish terrorist group headed by another future PM, Menachem Begin, killed 232 men, women and children and wounded another 370 from the end of 1937 until the middle of 1939], but rather at representatives, and therefore it is effective. If, in addition, it shakes the Jewish population out of its complacency, so much the better. Thus, and only thus, will the battle for liberation commence."
Published in the Lehi paper HeHazit (The Front), 1943
Israel learned from the best teacher, Britain. I believe Menachem Begin credited Britain for all of his tactics which we still see today when the IDF uses Arab prisoners as human shields. Orde Wingate did that exact same thing in 1936.
As Gogs points out, Israel's obsession with 'terrorism' is pure projection- the state of Israel was born of the most systematic terrorist campaign in modern history. Its victims including Count Bernadotte of the UN and Lord Moyne.
Its tactics were founded on the training settler colonists received from the likes of Orde Wingate seconded to Palestine from the Higher Institutes in native popular repression found in India and elsewhere across the empire
And never mind that Zionist terrorism was already a devastating reality in the years leading up to the Nakba. Begin, Shamir among the leading terrorist thugs. The Zionists are masters in terrorism! Britain lost many who were based in Palestine during the mandate to those bastards, and today stupid old Blighty supports, essentially, the same terrorists.
It is worth noting that “Israel” was the 1st to hijack a civilian airliner.
https://www.wrmea.org/1994-november-december/israel-was-first-nation-to-skyjack-a-civilian-airliner.html
Max Blumenthal's 'The Management of Savagery' is a great book, recounting US complicity with the 9/11 hijackers. Like your piece here, though, he doesn't engage with the physics of the 9/11 attacks. It's good to see some, like Piers Robinson, gradually calling out this era-defining abomination for what it was - a false flag. If you haven't already, Kit, it would be good to see you report - or interview - some of those highly qualified researchers who've concluded that the official account is not credible. https://www.ae911truth.org
I know what you mean, but I don't think Kit can afford to be associated with all that. The bad guys would use it against him.
It's difficult, isn't it. I've weighed this for a long time and come to the conclusion that we have to be able to have honest conversations about it without fear of being branded conspiracy theorists. There's too much at stake. If the official conspiracy theory is wrong - and I think it irrefutably is - then the way we narrate current history has to be reshaped. As things stand, contemporary history is framed by "terrorism" conducted by "rabid Islamists". Accepting that is to cede territory of legitimation.
I think I would actually agree with you there - especially about rejecting the fear of being labelled with a term intentionally loaded with negative connotations. I actually enthusiastically embrace the term 'conspiracy theorist' and essentially take back ownership of it. For me, though, as I'm not a prominent journalist one bad move away from the real terrorists bursting into my house at 4 in the morning, it's a little easier.
But it is true that we should all be hammering home certain truths and messages and attempting to wake as many people up as possible. On the other paw, I am fairly certain Kit is aware that the vast majority of his readership already know all these truths. So I think maybe it's about 'delegating roles' or something. I'm sure Kit also knows that many of his readers with less to lose will take care of the education of the people with regards to the basic concept of a false flag and the fact that buildings don't collapse like that without assistance. Laws of physics etc. That way, he can concentrate on these wonderful history explainer articles. Because these articles are essentially 'the big picture' which form the backdrop to all these false flags and hypocritical use of the word 'terrorism' by the real terrorists themselves (psychological projection etc.).
He can be quite clever about it though - notice how in this article he put the word 'blowback' in parentheses, and also linked to a 911 blogger article. Doing it that way means he retains that old chestnut known as 'plausible deniability'.
Great observations.
Actually I dont think that is what Kit is doing. I suspect he is referencing a seminal article about this, that was published several decades ago in the UK newspaper the Independent:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/terror-blowback-burns-cia-1182087.html
published Sunday 01 November 1998 00:02 GMT
by Andrew Marshall
"Terror 'blowback' burns CIA
"America's spies paid and trained their nation's worst enemies, reveals Andrew Marshall in Washington"
The point of the referenced article is that the US policy of sponsoring islamic-motivated guerrilla forces in Afghanistan, later on resulted in those very forces turning on the US in reaction to what they saw as the defilement of their holy land with US-bases (in effect US military occupation).
Further more "9/11" was not actually the start of the blowback. These forces, dubbed Al Qaida" by the US, had already in the early 1990s bombed US embassies in Kenya and Sudan, along with the USS Cole off Yemen. And "9/'11" was not the first bombing of the World Trade Center in New York. The same forces were linked to a previous attempt in 1993 in which a truck filled with explosives was set off in the parking garage of the building, placed near support structures where where apparently it was possible to bring the entire building down.
Unfortunately aready back in 2001 we lived in a media landscape devoid of any kind of grasp on history or ability to maintain and connect the dots, so 99.9% of the public were not even aware back then that "9/11" wasnt actually the first attack on the WTC attributed to the same group. And today the social media and mainstream media landscape is even MORE devoid of historical knowledge and insight. Its just one giant ball of momentary noise, with little or no perspective over time.
Anyway all these attacks on US buildings and military assets, by a group formerly known to be on the CIA payroll (via the Pakistani ISS and the Saudi security services) is what was and is considered to be "blockback".
Has it not long been written that "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?
The career of the Taliban is most instructive. When they were useful against the Soviets, the people who went on to form the Taliban were invited to the White House and none other than Ronald Regan lauded his guests as "the moral equivalent of the Founding Fathers". Once their usefulness ended, the Taliban were consigned to being retrograde oppressors of Muh Afghan Women and Girls.
For that matter, we may recall the South African and Rhodesian governments labeling anyone that they didn't like a "terrorist". This landed none other than Nelson Mandela on the UK terrorism watchlist - until 2003.
https://quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/DarusSalam/Hadith-2977
I feel honored that a journalist like Kit liked my post. Yes, I've purchased and read his books. A true hero for the Truth and please don't let it get you down that few seem to. view your recent podcast. Always hang in there for the truth. And while you may not agree with Tommy Robinson's documentary, it is real experience how different voices are shut down in the UK and I see it coming to the USA. No fear, no gain, no pain no gain. It is very sad majority of people don't know what we know. The entire world will be harmed greatly by ignorance and censorship.
This all sounds eerily reminiscent of the dirty tricks Britain's ruling class spent over a century perfecting in their first modern colony of their developed imperialist epoch - Ireland. Especially in the 1960s-90s with how 'The Troubles' played out in their media. Aside from the actual national liberation struggle taking place on the ground, there were always four or five fictional versions of it being sensationalized, promoted, and mystified in mass media. The atmosphere surrounding something otherwise relatively straightforward and understandable became so nonsensical that any average outsider passively consuming British/European media would be the least informed on the subject. Instead of asking uncomfortably awkward questions about foreign military occupation and imperialism, they'd convince people their own eyes and ears were wrong and fill their heads with a bunch of psychobabble about 'sectarianism' or 'extremism' or 'terrorism' - reasons for which must have begun so long ago, for reasons long since forgotten so don't worry about who's doing what to whom - instead of the truth staring you right in the face. They really did figure out the most effective use of public misdirection.
I believe that monster who created Bibi was quoted here in 1991. But this doctrine was actually developed in the years leading up to the Zionist State. They clearly feel that terror is justified and they have rightful monopoly to this.
“Palestinians are the canaries in the coal mine of humanity.” Absolutely and horrifyingly!