39 Comments
User's avatar
dacoelec's avatar

Our government/Israhell completely set it all up to make an endless profiting war machine against Islam, the imaginary enemy and the American people sucked up all the bullshit and propaganda/lies and around 30 to 40 percent still do today.

Libertarian Overwatch's avatar

On the stock market someone ALWAYS knows. Great work Kit.

Stephanie Welch's avatar

Thanks for this, when news first came out about the stock trades, it seemed not only plausible, but likely. Serendipitously, I was researching Bush family ties to Saudis for a radio show to be released Sept 12. I released it with a caveat that it was produced before the attacks (and clearly would have been a different show altogether otherwise.)

Stephanie Welch's avatar

If only I’d had a deeper understanding of U.S. foreign policy and their “management of savagery” strategy. https://makingcontactradio.org/transcript/2001/3701.html

The Cabbage Patch Kid's avatar

The Snopes debunking of this claim is hilarious.

It announces it as 'False' and then proceeds to provide no proof for that claim other than the fact that US authorities, despite these highly unusual significant share puts days before and specific to these companies directly associated with 9/11, have decided there was no link.

Embarrassing.

Feral Finster's avatar

It isn't just national security matters. Insider trading is rampant, and the authorities turn a blind eye.

Realist's avatar

Absolutely, as well as market manipulation. One example is naked short selling of precious metals.

Thurl's avatar
1dEdited

Believe short selling should be banned. Do not permit this on China stock exchange. Why should anyone be able to profit on and exacerbate a companies failure. Need to remove the incentives for people to do horrible shit (9/11 etc).

Realist's avatar

"Believe short selling should be banned."

Agreed, but the argument is that short selling benefits market liquidity and price discovery, and it’s crucial for market efficiency. Of course, that is BS; all those things are accomplished without short selling.

Martin.'s avatar

In my humble opinion, what we are seeing is the zionist/anglo american empire using Islam as the battering ram to destroy western Christian culture. The zionists are used as the management platform and Muslims are the foot soldiers. There's no such thing as organic terrorism, it's all a product of the three letter agencies & mossad.

Realist's avatar

Kit, great analysis.

It isn't just 9/11 and insider trading. The fact is, the United States is owned and controlled by the avaricious megalomaniacs. There is no functioning electoral system here.

FaresFares's avatar

Minor point: Dullest ap is in DC

The Cabbage Patch Kid's avatar

Even minorer point. Dullest ap is Stansted in Essex. 😁

FaresFares's avatar

Yeah, fucking autocorrect

Kazimir Malevitch's avatar

Thank you Kit. Very interesting correlation between 9/11 and Oct7th, very interesting as Hua Bin did post few days ago a very nice recap to the possible Gang behind 9/11 but also the financial speculation before and after, and how it was crystal clear organized by the Zionist Associates, including as you are citing Insurance and Financial services, when and why the WTC passed to a private owner and so on.

A must read https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/911-coincidence-theory

Another WorldView Is Possible's avatar

When we now hear about German central bank president Ernst Welteke's statements - it seems to line up with the previously known information, that many of the anomalous 'put options' were conducted through Deutsche Bank. In his talk/video "The Truth and Lies of "9/11"", Mike Ruppert had revealed that this activity had occurred - and then noted that since the CIA monitors market activity in real-time - that this SHOULD HAVE functioned as yet another layer of warning, that something like the events of that day, was imminent. As with the events of October 7th, 2023 - it also turned out that there were several direct forms of advanced warning, which were also suppressed/ignored. That video, and his book "Crossing The Rubicon" are both good at detailing the warning signs ignored, and the historical relationships between Wall Street, the SEC, and the CIA.

However, I see some upside to the conclusions of the FBI/SEC investigations into insider trading and foreknowledge, that you've added to the accumulated data set, Kit ... We could also read that as an acknowledgement, that the attacks weren't orchestrated by Al Qaeda, at all.

Another WorldView Is Possible's avatar

Crongard, I think. We should both check our spelling.

Paul Larudee's avatar

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it." ~Upton Sinclair

David Hancock's avatar

We know that capitalism doesn’t prioritize human lives. It prioritizes financial return instead. What would make 9/11 surprising though is that it is mainly white US citizens sacrificed for this financial return.

Martin.'s avatar

They don't care which type of human being is sacrificed to achieve their end goal. That's a mere irrilevance to the puppet masters. So, no, no surprise to me what so ever.

Sam's avatar
1dEdited

Kit, thanks for this story, none of which I was aware of. It places one more burden on me who is probably like many others who don't want to believe in "conspiracy theories," yet find such theories more and more believable as time goes by. Part of my own sensitivity to these theories is that as time goes by, I learn of more and more genuine lies and deceit that western governments traffic. What a shame. Will we ever reach the promised land when a great deal of the truth will lead to much more truthful western governments? If so, it will be because of the army of truth seekers such as yourself who never give up.

Penelope Pnortney's avatar

As Matt Stoller recently observed:

… the problem is not a lack of AI regulation. We have AI regulation. The problem is there’s an elite consensus that the rule of law simply does not apply to the powerful.

Take the law in an entirely different context. It is per se illegal to engage in a price-fixing conspiracy, what is in the law as a prohibition against a “restraint of trade.” But right now, billionaire Robert Kraft is openly organizing a conspiracy with other stadium and venue owners to deny access to music venues against the artist Macklemore because of his song protesting the genocide in Gaza... not only is it going without litigation or prosecution but it’s not even considered that Kraft should be held liable for what he’s doing.

There is an endless parade of this kind of lawlessness.

We no longer live in a land where people are “innocent until proven guilty,” the actual rule of law as practiced is “guilty until proven wealthy.”

Nanabukulu21's avatar

Its not even wealthy. Its being a company man and a big ego. As shown if the masses push back only then they do something. Not much but something. For 3 years I have watched the theatre that is local government justify investing in a genocide. Whilst silencing the few who speak up..They only put a clause to "consider" human rights and divestment After a legal battle from local activists pointed out it was illegal to state they could not divest. Despite that most of the councillors jeer and boo. Whilst saying there for dismantling institutional racism or against violence to women and girls. ????But if we had the numbers they would not be jeering and booing. But sadly most people just want to know what money they get when they retire.

Penelope Pnortney's avatar

I totally agree that money is at the root of all of it and as you point out, even those who aren't wealthy but won't look beyond their own interests are complicit. Have you ever heard Catherine Austin Fitts talk about her "red button" exercise? It was extremely revealing.

"But if we had the numbers they would not be jeering and booing." This is why I get so frustrated by people on both sides of the political spectrum who stay locked in the right vs. left paradigm and stubbornly resist recognizing that keeping us divided is by design, and that if we actually joined forces around our common grievances, our sheer numbers would make us impossible to ignore. Even then change won't come quickly, it's always going to require a slow grind, an often tedious commitment and accepting that while we may not benefit in our lifetimes we may be making it more likely that our kids and/or grandkids will.

Nanabukulu21's avatar

Totally, i m of the same opinion..It is just a team sport..red or blue. Blinkered to what your team captain does. Even if it is what the opposing captain does. It is the work done know that will hopefully take fruit in the future. What binds us should be shared humanity and ability to be stewards of earth and all living things on it.

Tom High's avatar

Love ain’t the drug; money is. And the addiction rate is in the upper 90s percentage range.

Carolyn L Zaremba's avatar

The love of money is.

Richard's avatar

Back in the 90s the Neocon planners stated that, following the fall of the wall in Berlin, the US needed a 'Pearl Harbour moment' in order to get the US populace behind them for a 'war on terror' that would keep the US military industrial complex sustained and profitable. For these Neocons, still running US politics today, the loss of US lives of whichever creed or colour, and whatever the number, is viewed purely as acceptable 'collateral damage'.