123 Comments
User's avatar
JennyStokes's avatar

And still the slimy British still do deals all over the world including Ukraine!

Thanks Kit. I knew about most of this but NOT all obviously. Hope the truth comes out.

Thank you Kit.

Expand full comment
Antoinette Janssen's avatar

Thank you so much, for exposing the British DNA, which is shockingly similar with Hitler's Nazi DNA, and which explains the ideas of for instance Johnson, Starmer, and so many more,

The "Good" :)) are now exposed, completely naked.

I am certain that there is more.

Expand full comment
Protect & Survive's avatar

There is indeed more Antoinette - but only the coming years will reveal the true extent of this dystopian century: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/britains-collapse-2025-part-2-birmingham?sd=pf

Rule nomber one: DO NOT COMPLY. Only by our own acceptance do we give our power away. We can withdaw this consent at any time.

Blessings

AP

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

your rule #1 sounds good

Expand full comment
Grand Mal Twerkin's avatar

We must eliminate people with evil DNA. It is the Final Solution to forever end racism!

Expand full comment
Dave White's avatar

Haha!

Expand full comment
zzz's avatar

they never called themselves nazis it is all b s british dna ? is that the celts the picts the romans the saxons the vikings who are you talking about?

Expand full comment
Antoinette Janssen's avatar

There are levels of civilization. The west never evolved. They think like the Neanderthalers. And about the DNA: it needs also some level of intelligence to understand what is meant by that.

But once also your time will come. :)

Expand full comment
Ronald Reed's avatar

I think you're being unfair to the Neanderthals. Current researchin anthropology indicates that they not only intermarried with our Cro-Magnon ancestors, but were largely peaceable, and may have been killed off by their more agressive neighbors. The first genocide?

Expand full comment
BillLawson's avatar

Hitlers coming to power in January 1933 was welcomed by the Tory media in Britain for the first victims of the fascist regime were the communistfollowed by the unions and moderate socialists of the SPD. By the summer of 1934 over 100,000 communists, trade unionists and socialists were in concentration camps. There was not a peep of protest from the British state or tory media. Instead there was praise for Hitler.

Throughout the 30s British and French imperialism tried to constantly turn the attention of Hitler to the East towards the Soviet Union. They consistently rejected overture from the Soviet Union for a mutual defence pact against German and Italian fascism.

Let's be clear the Red Army broke the back of the German genocidal Wehrmacht. Over 80% of Wehrmacht casualties were on the Eastern Front while 90% of its divisions were stationed in the USSR. From the battle outside Moscow to the battles of Stalingrad, Kursk and operation Bagration the Red Army destroyed the German Army Groups Centre and South.

We also shouldn't forget that it was the Red Army which liberated most of the extermination camps and Berlin itself. The Red Army lost over a million men liberating eastern Europe from fascist control yet thousands of war memorials to Red Army sold have been pulled down. The German government has the temerity to not invite representatives of the Russian government to the celebrations in Berlin this month.

Finally, as a former history teacher in the UK for 20 years I can say that all that is taught is the Blitz and D Day. There is no mention in the national curriculum about the critical role of the Soviet Union in defeating German fascism. Absolutely shameful.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
May 5
Comment removed
Expand full comment
treehill's avatar

The Holocaust denialism in the comments is a scourge. I hope Kit pays attention and cleans this up.

Expand full comment
Kit Klarenberg's avatar

On it. Please flag any - Substack will update me instantly and it's gone. I'll also look for it myself!

Expand full comment
John Paul McGroarty's avatar

Yes. The denialists on this thread are disgraceful

Expand full comment
Reginald Duquesnoy's avatar

Brilliant! Kit. With the slight reservation that in this Bristish/German nazi pas-de-deux, you leave in the shadow the omni-present diabolus ex-machina, the American puppeteer master mind, playing as usual both sides of the fence, hankering after the remnants of the British empire and already far in cahoot with the Thousand Year Reich, their preferred Trojan horse in the submission of old Europe and conquest of the vast Russian steppes and riches. Their lines of communication with the Nazis were established as soon as the lost gambit battle of Moscow, which marked the real turning point for people in the know, rather than Stalingrad, Kursk or Bagration, mere logical and implacable chess moves. What is happening in Ukraine now, started in 1870, 155 years ago...but if pushed you could even argue several hundred years before.

Anyway, History, the real one," le fil de l'Histoire", has a long continuum which dwarfs what they, the Atlantist dominant class, are trying to mesmerie & lobotomize us with.

Expand full comment
Patrick Hertel's avatar

You have to see Henry Ford in there at least.

Expand full comment
Reginald Duquesnoy's avatar

yes, but just one, amongst many others of the dominant/dominoes...

Expand full comment
Patrick Hertel's avatar

That's why I said "at least" :)

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

Yes, He didn’t like those communists that took over Russia. That’s what he was against.

Expand full comment
Robert Hand's avatar

Your contributions to knowing the facts about western imperialism and fitting them into an understanding of how the world works are second to none. Much appreciated!

Expand full comment
Kit Klarenberg's avatar

Incredibly kind praise Robert! Thank you!!!

Expand full comment
tito salvo's avatar

What do you call current situation?

The Global Anglo Zionist Army is currently committing a genocide.

Expand full comment
Bob Martin's avatar

Excellent article. I knew essentially nothing of this history, and none of it really surprises me. Fascism and capitalism are close siblings (or even two sides of one coin), so cooperation between the two is the rule, not the exception.

Expand full comment
Carolyn L Zaremba's avatar

I knew most of this, but not the extent of Britain's plans to join up with Germany. It would seem that Neville Chamberlain took all the blame for "appeasement" when the UK government itself was already plotting to unite with Germany.

Expand full comment
Kojo's avatar

Its not a surprise that people dont know the Soviet Union was the msin force that defeated Germany - they dont READ.

They watch TV and their minds are brainwashed there with videos of Spitfire and Mustang pilots in glamourous scarves etc. Not hordes Soviet infantrynen sacrificing their blood.

Expand full comment
Kurvingrad's avatar

After Stalingrad the fate of Kraut nazis was sealed.

US rushed to D day to make a relevance and prevent Soviets marching through streets of Paris once again. They had investments to protect, much like mineral deal of contemporary times.

.

Reading would not make much of a difference to people who are nose deep into debt. Critical thinking almost vanished from Western culture. Even if slapped in the face with digested info, they would be unable to grasp it.

Tv and msm is the most they can absorb, and they gulp it.

Expand full comment
Carolyn L Zaremba's avatar

I'm a "baby boomer" and my father fought in WWII, towing a glider across the English Channel on D-Day. Even he and his compatriots knew that the only reason D-Day was survived was because Hitler had sent the majority of his troops to the Soviet Union, where they got clobbered. Dad made it home or there would be no me.

Expand full comment
Kurvingrad's avatar

There was still a great effort that came from the west side and without it there was no guarantee that soviets would've crunch the spine of krauts.

Expand full comment
Bushwacked71's avatar

Liberal capitalism teaming up with communism, it’s almost like one group controlled and controls both sides.

Expand full comment
Lev Jacoby's avatar

You're right.

Expand full comment
Konstantin's avatar

Hi, Kit! I think this stuff from former counsellor of the ambassador to the Soviet Union, Patrick Armstrong, helps to add the picture even more: https://patrickarmstrong.ca/2024/06/18/another-anniversary-nobody-remembers/

Hope you see it!

Expand full comment
Kit Klarenberg's avatar

Thanks for this Konstantin!

Expand full comment
Marcella Amlie's avatar

The Zionist-Anglo-American bankers and American Industrialists funded Hitler and Mussolini. The objective of WWII was Bretton Woods and the IMF and the destruction of European Industry.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

What about the efforts made to get Eisenhower to start a another war, under the guise of a preemptive one? His memoirs tell a lot.

Expand full comment
Marcella Amlie's avatar

Interesting. Why would Eisenhower want to start another war when WWII achieved its objectives_ Also Eisenhower warned about the MIC as he left office so the two agendas might contradict each other.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

Sorry If it wasn’t clear to some:

Eisenhower didn’t want to, he vehemently objected to the thought and had “nice words” for those that proposed this. It seemed to me that he had to ward off many ambitious people. CIA head was one.

Expand full comment
Marcella Amlie's avatar

You know, the long forgotten and ignored Korean War (razing Korea to the ground) might be the war they were itching for or really the Gladio in Italy and other covert actions like weaponizing militaries and right wing factions. Like Colombia's so-called civil war, kicking off decades of drug trafficking. Now that I think of it debt was weaponized in the Global South with the IMF and World Bank into a real cold war.

Expand full comment
Ahenobarbus's avatar

Thank you for identifying this, very real, Imperialist attack on the history of WW2:

"This is just one of several modern-day pushes to perversely conflate Communism and Nazism, while transforming Wehrmacht and SS collaborators, Holocaust perpetrators, and ultranationalists and fascists in countries liberated by the Red Army into victims, and laying blame for World War II at Russia’s feet, by dent of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact."

Expand full comment
Mike Carey's avatar

Nazism and Communism are conflated because both are totalitarian, collectivist, and each denies the individual rights and freedoms spawned by the Enlightment. Also, NAZI stands for National Socialist German Workers Party.

Starting to understand now?

Expand full comment
ahenobarbus's avatar

So, ones just as good as the other. Why, prey tell, was the west forced to ally with the Soviets? You think you're clever, but you're just another Nazi apologist. I can only imagine your view of the Neo-nazi dictatorship in Ukraine.

In two words: fuck off.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

Read who controlled German social, economic, educational and government control at the time. It was a horrible time for Germany. Hitler got rid of the Rothschild bank and issued Germany currency. Created Volkswagen and build highways. Economy picked up until they were cut off from all trade due to that. Poverty came back and desperation. I really don’t know if there is an answer to all this.

Expand full comment
ahenobarbus's avatar

Ian Kershaw, Konrad Heiden and of course, Leon Trotsky all wrote excellent accounts of the period. Highly recommend them all.

Expand full comment
Stegiel's avatar

"Almost" is laughable.

https://archive.org/details/sutton-wall-street-and-hitler

Penetrating a cloak of falsehood, deception, and duplicity, Professor Sutton reveals one of the most remarkable and under-reported facts of World War II―that key Wall Street banks and American businesses supported Hitler’s rise to power by financing and trading with Nazi Germany. Carefully tracing this closely guarded secret through original documents and eyewitness accounts, Sutton comes to the unsavory conclusion that the catastrophe of World War II was extremely profitable for a select group of financial insiders. He presents a thoroughly documented account of the role played by J.P. Morgan, T.W. Lamont, the Rockefeller interests, General Electric, Standard Oil, and the National City, Chase, and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, General Motors, Ford Motor Company, and scores of others in helping to prepare the bloodiest, most destructive war in history.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

Yes, that should be widely known. World War 1 was also a bankers war. It just continued.

Expand full comment
Frank Revelo's avatar

Reason the British declared war after Germany invaded Poland, instead of weaseling out of their defense agreement, was because Stalin had foiled the British plans to use Germany as a battering ram against USSR and the British knew they were doomed if they didn't act quickly, since a united Germany/USSR could easily crush France and then blockade and subdue Britain. Long run, only hope for Britain was to bring the USA in and/or split Germany and USSR, and eventually both these happened, so Britain was saved and this able to rewrite history.

Stalin did not want to invade Poland but saw an agreement with Germany as the only way to turn Germany west towards France, so as to buy more time to arm the USSR for the eventual clash with Germany. Stalin convinced Hitler that Britain and France were conspiring to attack Germany while Germany was focused on war in the east, and the only way to avoid this was for Germany to neutralize France first. Both Hitler and Stalin knew Germany and USSR were doomed to clash eventually, and so Hitler would have been suspicious of Stalin's reasoning, however the logic was impeccable and Hitler already suspected the British/French plan, so it didn't take much for Stalin to convince Hitler.

Expand full comment
Billy Masterson's avatar

When an ultra nationalist leader habitually uses cocaine/amphetamines, bad things happen... Then or now.

Expand full comment
Carolyn L Zaremba's avatar

Which nation?

Expand full comment
Billy Masterson's avatar

Adolf Hitler's personal Dr. Feelgood was giving him both Cocaine and amphetamines, plus other distinctly ODD things. Plenty of other prominent Nazis were drug addicts too, particularly Herman Goering (they took away his stash and made him go cold turkey when he arrived for Nuremberg trials).

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15825245/

Since 2022 it has become rather well known that Zelensky's drug of choice is Cocaine. Meanwhile, Joe Biden was being given enough Adderall to keep him semi coherent when they needed to put him in front of a camera.

Expand full comment
Isadem's avatar

The stuff we’re all learning these days, only because the Zios are showing themselves to be the absolute sickos that they are, is insane 😀👌🏻

Expand full comment
Lev Jacoby's avatar

Why was a clash between Germany and the USSR inevitable?

Expand full comment
steve hendren's avatar

Just finished reading America First by HW Brands. Your article fully supports Charles Lindbergh’s disgust over Britain’s actions towards Germany during the 1930’s which helped fuel his efforts to keep the US out of the war. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Mark Chapman's avatar

Remarkable - I am gobsmacked! Where do you FIND this stuff?? Britain's current and ongoing weapons-grade Russophobia is particularly sickening in light of its cozying-up to the Nazis, never acknowledged, of course.

I suppose we should not be surprised that more than three times as many British respondents answered 'Don't know' to the question of who did the most to defeat Nazi Germany as answered 'The Soviet Union'...but ignorance goes only so far as a defense. And plainly there are still some lingering regrets in Britain's political circles that the Germans did not win.

Expand full comment
Kit Klarenberg's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment