15 Comments

Yes and not one frame of video of a commercial jet flying into the Pentagon, arguably the most monitored facility in the world.

Expand full comment

Thank God for investigative journalists who haven't largely or wholly forgotten.

So many strange things on that day that any sane person can impossibly endorse the official cover story.

.

"Two Planes Hit Two Buildings & Three Buildings Fell Down

The Weird Thing Is The News Reported World Trade Center Building 7 Collapsing 22 Minutes Before It Collapsed… "

https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/1682506410435940352

.

What are all those explosions on even the facade of the building - across floors?

https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/1682169603039047681

.

Can anyone get the facts straight?

.

Why are alternative, more plausible causes of the skyscrapers collapsing not even looked at?

https://johnbphillips.substack.com/p/does-our-military-have-directed-energy?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

#CancelCulture

.

Swiss historian Daniele Ganser wrote his PhD on Secret Services (Operation Gladio for one - secret armies in Europe, officially denied until it was not deniable any longer...)

Media not independent as becomes obvious on many ends... (Russia Gate, HB's laptop, elections..)

.

Thanks for continuing to raise critical questions, Kit.

Despite the intimidating interrogation upon return to UK airport earlier this year.

Prof Nils Melzer (International Human Rights, Glasgow, former Special Rapporteur for Torture, UN):

.

"Freedom of expression is guaranteed so long as we discuss only what is served up to us in the headlines.

When we stray into subject areas declared off-limits, our d i s s e n t becomes a 'conspiracy theory' & our thirst for k n o w l e d g e criminal 'espionage'"—

#FreeAssangeNOW

Expand full comment

Kit is a treasure! My number one favorite investigative journalist. Another powerful, exclusive, well-written piece.

Expand full comment

The CIA and other national security agencies have been allowed free rein to operate as they wish with no impediment, basically no need to follow the laws of the country or international law. What they have morphed into is basically a result of Congressional negligence and incompetence. Very, very dangerous!

Expand full comment

And nobody noticed a full-sized commercial jet flying at only a meter above the ground? Seriously? Ho ho ho.

Expand full comment

Great work, Kit!

Expand full comment

What would we do without you?

Expand full comment

Thank you for your infomed report.

Expand full comment

One of the most credible/revealing documentations of the day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi887OFzsx8

(Architects & Engineers for 9/11 - WTC 7 (2011))

We have to follow the truth wherever it leads us.

Official version: "There is no evidence of explosives."

Well, did you look for it? - No.

That's not quite how science works!

*Pentagon hokus-pokus* - Clown world.

P.S.: More evidence on Secret Military TECHNOLOGY / Operations involving aircraft (2014):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26lWfya0xSI&list=LL&index=6

👉What makes the next-gen technology dangerous is the SECRECY around it

(read: "ABUSE" with impunity);

also covered in https://johnbphillips.substack.com/p/we-have-silent-invisible-antigravity

(topical blog, fully referenced+illustrated)

.

Substantial: Dr. Steven Greer's DISCLOSURE PROJECT

Press Club Event: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zDY7t6HihCw&list=LL&index=32

Greer interviews at https://open.spotify.com/episode/49lcmnBlsXurWaBP9icsya

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2023·edited Oct 11, 2023

I saw the pictures of the Pentagon. A small round hole was made by a commercial airliner. That was the damage externally? OK. So what happened to the wings, engines, and tail? Those pieces don't vaporize. Look at the holes made in the towers when the planes hit them, then look at the hole in the Pentagon. They don't match and there is no explanation how they cannot be similar. I have not looked into the official engineering explanation of what happened, so my previous sentence is just a "plain view" response.

I'm an engineer and I spent a LOT of time some years ago looking into the towers falling. I did look into the official engineering explanation of how WTC 1 and 2 fell. The NIST analysis is faulty. WTC 7 falling into its own footprint due to fires is just laughable, and the University of Alaska has done a fine study detailing how the official explanation is garbage.

I'll probably never know for sure what happened on 9/11 (I'm 59) but I'm hoping that if humanity survives the 21st century the truth will eventually come out, for the sake of all the victims of 9/11 and the insane "War on Terror" that resulted.

Expand full comment